| Re: OpenVZ vs. vserver [message #11584 is a reply to message #11458] |
Tue, 27 March 2007 18:08   |
Enrico Weigelt
Messages: 31
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
* Kir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org> wrote:
Hi,
> As per my experience porting to powerpc platform, OpenVZ is easily
> portable, i.e. it is 95% platform-independent code (not counting the
> checkpointing functionality, which IS very platform-specific).
we probably won't need checkpointing, so I hope it will run
on mips ...
> So, if somebody needs OpenVZ for some currently unsupported platform
> (say, ARM), they can either do a port themselves, or provide us with a
> couple of boxes and we will do the port.
maybe I'll have a look at it in a few weeks.
cu
--
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
|
|
|
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
