| Re: OpenVZ vs. vserver [message #11458 is a reply to message #11444] |
Sat, 24 March 2007 10:36   |
|
|
As per my experience porting to powerpc platform, OpenVZ is easily
portable, i.e. it is 95% platform-independent code (not counting the
checkpointing functionality, which IS very platform-specific).
So, if somebody needs OpenVZ for some currently unsupported platform
(say, ARM), they can either do a port themselves, or provide us with a
couple of boxes and we will do the port.
Mike Holloway wrote:
>
> The type of embedded platform you are developing for may steer your
> decision. I went looking for which cpu architectures are supported by
> openvz and vserver patches and found this wiki entry. Someone may
> care to update that entry.
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_virtual_machines
>
>
> -mike
>
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Ian P. Christian wrote:
>
>> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>> does anyone known an good compasiron between OVZ + vserver ?
>>> I need an virtualization within embedded systems (small devices).
>>
>> I'm not sure this will help - but when I was looking at various
>> visualizations systems, I decided vserver wasn't an option very
>> quickly when I noticed it didn't do migrations.
>>
>> --Ian P. Christian ~ http://pookey.co.uk
|
|
|
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
