OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » dead code: EXT3_IOC_WAIT_FOR_READONLY?
Re: dead code: EXT3_IOC_WAIT_FOR_READONLY? [message #11270 is a reply to message #11261] Fri, 16 March 2007 12:03 Go to previous message
Andrew Morton is currently offline  Andrew Morton
Messages: 127
Registered: December 2005
Senior Member
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:16:28 +0300 Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've found some strange ext3 ioctl under CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG:
> EXT3_IOC_WAIT_FOR_READONLY.
>
> I had DEBUG_SPINLOCK enabled and my kernel was crashed on wait-for-readonly.c
> test from ext3-tools because ioctl handler tries to use uninitialized
> EXT3_SB(sb)->ro_wait_queue and waits EXT3_SB(sb)->turn_ro_timer that nobody uses
> in kernel.
>
> I do not understand the function of this ioctl and believe this code is dead
> long time ago. From my POV it makes sense to remove it from kernel instead of
> fixing it. Has somebody any objections?

It exists to support my original ext3 recovery-testing code. The idea is
that you mount the filesytem with ro_after=1000, then after 1000 jiffies a
timer fires and the underlying device driver starts ignoring writes. You
then run the EXT3_IOC_WAIT_FOR_READONLY ioctl to wait for the timer to have
fired, then kill off the the stresstest programs, then unmount the fs, then
fsck it.


Yes, it's kind of dead code now - I don't think anyone has used it since
2001 or so.

We do need to resurrect the functionality: it was very powerful and found
several problems.

People recently reported serious-looking ext3 recovery bugs but nobody
seems interested in investigating them.

A reimplementation probaby wouldn't use any of the old code so sure, feel
free to send in a patch which removes it.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [RFC] kernel/pid.c pid allocation wierdness
Next Topic: Re: [RFC] kernel/pid.c pid allocation wierdness
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 16 17:09:00 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.30825 seconds