OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Resource controllers based on process containers
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Resource controllers based on process containers [message #10910 is a reply to message #10888] Wed, 07 March 2007 06:52 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Balbir Singh is currently offline  Balbir Singh
Messages: 491
Registered: August 2006
Senior Member
Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> This patchset adds RSS, accounting and control and
> limiting the number of tasks and files within container.
>
> Based on top of Paul Menage's container subsystem v7
>
> RSS controller includes per-container RSS accounter,
> reclamation and OOM killer. It behaves like standalone
> machine - when container runs out of resources it tries
> to reclaim some pages and if it doesn't succeed in it
> kills some task which mm_struct belongs to container in
> question.
>
> Num tasks and files containers are very simple and
> self-descriptive from code.
>
> As discussed before when a task moves from one container
> to another no resources follow it - they keep holding the
> container they were allocated in.
>

I have one problem with the patchset, I cannot compile
the patches individually and some of the code is hard
to read as it depends on functions from future patches.
Patch 2, 3 and 4 fail to compile without patch 5 applied.

Patch 1 failed to apply with a reject in kernel/Makefile
I applied it on top of 2.6.20 with all of Paul Menage's
patches (all 7).



--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem
Next Topic: Linux-VServer example results for sharing vs. separate mappings ...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Aug 07 18:28:42 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02883 seconds