OpenVZ Forum: Devel » utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

Home » Mailing lists » Devel » utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21) [message #10399 is a reply to message #10247]

Sun, 18 February 2007 02:35

Roland McGrath
Messages: 7
Registered: February 2007

Junior Member

> Looking at mainline x86_64 ptrace code I think hole for u_debugreg[4]
> and [5] is also needed.

It's not. The utrace_regset for the debugregs already has that behavior
for those two words, so mapping all 8 uarea words to the regset is fine.

Thanks,
Roland

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21) By: adobriyan on Mon, 12 February 2007 12:47
		Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21) By: Roland McGrath on Mon, 12 February 2007 21:36
		Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21) By: adobriyan on Tue, 13 February 2007 13:05
		Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21) By: adobriyan on Thu, 15 February 2007 12:02
		Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21) By: adobriyan on Tue, 13 February 2007 15:28
		Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21) By: Roland McGrath on Sun, 18 February 2007 02:35
		Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21) By: adobriyan on Wed, 21 February 2007 13:30
		Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21) By: Roland McGrath on Wed, 07 March 2007 09:10

Previous Topic:	Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/3][RFC] Containers: Pagecache controller reclaim
Next Topic:	Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/3][RFC] Containers: Pagecache controller reclaim

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Sep 20 10:54:02 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05984 seconds