OpenVZ Forum


Home » General » Support » *SOLVED* VE with veth, using MAC address it shouldn't be aware of
Re: VE with veth, using MAC address it shouldn't be aware of [message #10047 is a reply to message #10004] Tue, 06 February 2007 11:44 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
samlt is currently offline  samlt
Messages: 8
Registered: February 2007
Junior Member
No NAT in VE0, but I did set a route to 10.4.0/24 in the linksys.(going through 10.3.0.50)
I fail to see why it would be important (except that I would have any "echo reply" ) The VE is using (at least that's what I understand looking at tcpdump output) the VE0 eth0 MAC address, and the linksys MAC address.

I know the VE is "sharing/using" (?) the same kernel as VE0, so this is probably normal, but if it is, why, in the VE, does ip n l only give veth103.0 MAC address? In short what would be the use of this "neighbour table" if it isn't used Confused

The fact is, that, on the other way (line 6 in the sorted tcpdump output, first post), the mac addresses are "correct" :
6) 10:02:24.542633 00:18:51:b4:a6:85 (oui Unknown) > 00:18:51:ce:18:98 (oui Unknown), ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 98: linksys > debnated: ICMP echo reply, id 56597, seq 1, length 64 == on veth103.0
where 00:18:51:b4:a6:85 is veth103.0 MAC address, and 00:18:51:ce:18:98 is the VE eth0 MAC address.

I going to test the last openvz kernel asap, tonight if I can.

[Updated on: Wed, 07 February 2007 12:32]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Using NAT in VE problem? help~~~
Next Topic: *SOLVED* MASQUERADE with IPTables in a VPS
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 16 22:19:26 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03005 seconds