OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: Network virtualization/isolation
Re: Network virtualization/isolation [message #8718 is a reply to message #8715] Mon, 04 December 2006 15:45 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
ebiederm is currently offline  ebiederm
Messages: 1354
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org> writes:

> On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:00, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ok. Just a quick summary of where I see the discussion.
>>
>> We all agree that L2 isolation is needed at some point.
> As we all agreed on this, may be it is time to send patches one-by-one?
> For the beggining, I propose to resend Cedric's empty namespace patch as base
> for others - it is really empty, but necessary in order to move further.
>
> After this patch and the following net namespace unshare patch will be
> accepted, I could send network devices virtualization patches for review and
> discussion.
>
> What do you think?

I think sending out these patches for review sounds great.

For merge order I think enabling the unshare/clone flags to anyone
but developers should be about the last thing we do.

Starting with clone/unshare sounds to me like hitching up the cart
before it is built.

I really need to focus on finishing up the pid namespace, so except
for a little review and conversation I'm not going to help much on the
network side.

Of course I need to mess with unix domain sockets to properly
implement the pid namespace. Because of the pid credential passing.

Eric

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: openvz initscript for gentoo
Next Topic: Re: [patch -mm 16/17] net namespace: add unshare
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Jun 16 04:18:21 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.41941 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers