OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Users » OpenVZ kernel RPM name
Re: Re: [Users] OpenVZ kernel RPM name [message #8463 is a reply to message #8243] Mon, 20 November 2006 14:01 Go to previous message
kir is currently offline  kir
Messages: 1645
Registered: August 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Senior Member

Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
>
>
>> Dag Wieers wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Kirill Kolyshkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/16/06, Dag Wieers <dag@wieers.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yet another mail. The official openvz kernel RPMs are named in such a
>>>>> way
>>>>> that it causes problems. Tools like yum and apt make a special case
>>>>> about
>>>>> kernel RPM files because multiple of these can be installed next to each
>>>>> other.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because OpenVZ name their kernel ovzkernel, this is not possible. Can we
>>>>> change the name of the OpenVZ kernel package from:
>>>>>
>>>>> ovzkernel-2.6.9-023stab030.1-smp
>>>>> to:
>>>>> kernel-smp-2.6.9-42.0.3.ovz.1
>>>>>
>>>>> This would make it more clear to people what it is based on and would
>>>>> make
>>>>> apt and yum work with those kernels by default.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I though that (at least) yum detects "install-only" packages by their
>>>> 'provides', not by name. I might be wrong with that though...here's a
>>>> relevant section of /usr/lib/yum-plugins/installonlyn.py (yum-2.6.1):
>>>>
>>>> for instpkg in conf.installonlypkgs:
>>>> for m in mems:
>>>> if (m.name == instpkg or instpkg in m.po.getProvidesNames()) \
>>>> and m.ts_state in ('i', 'u'):
>>>>
>>>> I'm not yum expert but it seems that 'instpkg in m.po.getProvidesNames()'
>>>> is
>>>> the piece of code which helps in this scenario.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It's possible, still I don't see why you would deviate from the standard
>>> name. The functionality is most likely introduced to consider kernel-smp and
>>> kernel-bigmem as an alternative to kernel.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, this doesn't work for apt. kernel-ovz might work, but the
>>> proper way to tag a package is in the version or release tags. Not the
>>> package-name.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> We name our kernel packages as 'ovzkernel...' just because we don't want
>>>> to
>>>> mess with usual non-openvz kernels. OpenVZ and non-OpenVZ kernel should
>>>> not
>>>> be treated uniformly, otherwise yum will "upgrade" OpenVZ
>>>> 2.6.16-basedkernel with stock
>>>> 2.6.18 -- which is a wrong thing to do. Well, the fact that vzctl depends
>>>> on
>>>> something that ovzkernel provides might help, but I'm not sure.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> People should restrict what packages they use from what repsitory they have
>>> enabled and/or exceptions. Having ovzkernel will not prevent additional
>>> kernel packages to be updated and potentially replacing the ovz kernel in
>>> grub. Especially when like in our case, we like to have the stock kernel
>>> available for disaster recovery, troubleshooting or vendor-support.
>>>
>>> So I don't see the purpose of renaming the ovz kernel package to ovzkernel.
>>> Users still need to check what kernel is in place and verify before
>>> rebooting. If anything, it gives a false sense of security or causes more
>>> confusing.
>>>
>>> Especially when documentation and forums refer to the following command to
>>> list the available kernels:
>>>
>>> rpm -q kernel
>>> or rpm -qa 'kernel-*'
>>>
>>> Proper standards should try to reduce the amount of 'expert' information.
>>> Needing to know that the openvz kernel is called ovzkernel is useless
>>> information by any means.
>>>
>> Dag, all,
>>
>> As you might be aware we have switched to name our kernel rpm just 'kernel' in
>> the latest devel release.
>>
>> Apparently, it broke the yum update procedure. New kernel is not recognized by
>> yum, even if it provides vzkernel. I have tried with a kernel package which
>> also 'Provides: ovzkernel = 2.6.18-ovz028test002' but that doesn't change the
>> situation. I will now try with 'Obsoletes: ovzkernel' but this solution is
>> rough since it will probably uninstall the previous kernel (depends on yum
>> version perhaps).
>>
>> I have also try "new install" scenario on my FC5 system, it works but with a
>> bad side effect:
>>
>> Dependencies Resolved
>>
>> ============================================================ =================
>> Package Arch Version Repository Size
>> ============================================================ =================
>> Installing:
>> vzctl i386 3.0.12-1 openvz 114 k
>> vzquota i386 3.0.9-1 openvz 47 k
>> Removing:
>> kernel i686 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 installed 39 M
>> Installing for dependencies:
>> kernel i686 2.6.18-ovz028test002.1 openvz-kernel-devel
>> 11 M
>>
>> I.e. it tries to remove the latest FC5 kernel :-\ Too bad, I don't want
>> that...
>>
>> Perhaps somebody has a way to fix that?
>>
>
> Might this be because your system is configured to hold not more than X
> number of kernels ? I see no reason why a new kernel would cause an old
> kernel to be removed if there's no obsolete statement, except if there's a
> LIFO mechanism to push old kernels out.
>
> I'm interested to see the SPEC file and debug the problem.
The major problem here comes from the fact that OpenVZ kernels are older
than the distro ones.

Problem 1: clean install of kernel from rpm using yum:

[kir@kir kernel]$ sudo rpm -ihv kernel-2.6.18-ovz028test003.1.i686.rpm
Preparing... ###########################################
[100%]
package kernel-2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 (which is newer than
kernel-2.6.18-ovz028test003.1) is already installed

Possible fixes: remove all distro kernels (including the one you are
running on), or use --oldpackage option to rpm.

Still it will not solve the next problem.

Problem 2: yum update:

$ sudo yum update
...
============================================================ =================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
============================================================ =================
Installing:
kernel i686 2.6.18-1.2239.fc5
updates 15 M
Removing:
kernel i686 2.6.18-ovz028test003.1
installed 28 M
kernel i686 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5
installed 39 M
Removing for dependencies:
vzctl i386 3.0.12-1 installed 321 k
vzpkg noarch 2.7.0-18 installed 78 k
vzquota i386 3.0.9-1 installed 140 k
vztmpl-fedora-core-5 i386 2.0-2 installed 199 k
vztmpl-mandriva-2006 i386 1.0-1 installed 200 k

Possible fix: disable kernel packages from all the repos but OpenVZ one.
Hard to do since you can not do it in your own .repo file.

To tell the truth, I'm a bit lost at this point. Can anybody suggest
anything?
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: iptables functionality
Next Topic: OpenVZ quota problem
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jul 28 12:35:34 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02880 seconds