OpenVZ Forum


Home » General » Support » *SOLVED* optimization on privvmpages failcnt
icon9.gif  *SOLVED* optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8134] Thu, 09 November 2006 09:08 Go to next message
victorskl is currently offline  victorskl
Messages: 28
Registered: September 2006
Junior Member
 
-bash-3.00# cat /proc/user_beancounters
Version: 2.5                                                                   
       uid  resource           held    maxheld    barrier      limit    failcnt
       102: kmemsize       12114638   12647900   34333450   37766795          0
            lockedpages           0          8       1676       1676          0
            privvmpages      620219     667841     620896     682985        886
            shmpages            573       2189      62089      62089          0
            dummy                 0          0          0          0          0
            numproc              66         82        838        838          0
            physpages        401426     422359          0 2147483647          0
            vmguarpages           0          0     620896 2147483647          0
            oomguarpages     401426     422359     620896 2147483647          0
            numtcpsock           15         32        838        838          0
            numflock             17         26       1000       1100          0
            numpty                1          1         83         83          0
            numsiginfo            0          4       1024       1024          0
            tcpsndbuf        134160     261612    8012035   11444483          0
            tcprcvbuf        245760     376912    8012035   11444483          0
            othersockbuf     155632     435680    4006017    7438465          0
            dgramrcvbuf           0       8380    4006017    4006017          0
            numothersock        131        161        838        838          0
            dcachesize            0          0    7498066    7723008          0
            numfile            2019       2651      13408      13408          0
            dummy                 0          0          0          0          0
            dummy                 0          0          0          0          0
            dummy                 0          0          0          0          0
            numiptent            39         39        100        100          0
-bash-3.00#


Hi i was trying and i rise it up all the way 2G+.. but failcnt very oftenly hit on privvmpages.. I knew it related to applications. most probably, Apache.. Can guide me how could i trace effectively..

Thanks a lot..

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-user.png

[Updated on: Mon, 13 November 2006 18:58]

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8136 is a reply to message #8134] Thu, 09 November 2006 09:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dim is currently offline  dim
Messages: 344
Registered: August 2005
Senior Member
It is definitely bug. Please, fill it at the http://bugzilla.openvz.org in order to force us to don't miss it. Please, post as much info as possible there, in particular used kernel version, it's config.

Concerning how to debug. If you have assumption, that this could be because of the apache, you could just start/stop it and check, does privvmpages held value is changed.

http://static.openvz.org/openvz_userbar_en.gif

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8138 is a reply to message #8134] Thu, 09 November 2006 10:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xemul is currently offline  xemul
Messages: 248
Registered: November 2005
Senior Member
This doesn't look like a BUG for me. This looks like some task eats more memory than it should. Could you please give us access to this VE so we could track what has happened?

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-developer.png

[Updated on: Thu, 09 November 2006 10:43]

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8153 is a reply to message #8134] Thu, 09 November 2006 14:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
victorskl is currently offline  victorskl
Messages: 28
Registered: September 2006
Junior Member
Thanks thanks..

I used latest RHEL Kernel as stated at my signature... The VE use CentOS template.

[root@localhost ~]# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.9-023stab032.1-enterprise #1 SMP Fri Oct 20 03:13:34 MSD 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@localhost ~]#


These are for example, after that respective VE getting mad...
[root@localhost ~]# /usr/sbin/vzctl exec 102 service --status-all
bash: error while loading shared libraries: libtermcap.so.2: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory
[root@localhost ~]# /usr/sbin/vzctl enter 102
entered into VE 102
Unable to set raw mode: Interrupted system call
-bash: error while loading shared libraries: libtermcap.so.2: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory
exited from VE 102
[root@localhost ~]#


This is the last portion of dmesg..
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
VZDQ: detached inode not in creation, orig 5, dev dm-0, inode 73828039, fs ext3
current 18761 (httpd), VE 102, time 77463.605075
 [<ed79c296>] vzquota_det_qmblk_recalc+0x256/0x270 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c302>] vzquota_inode_qmblk_recalc+0x52/0x70 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c573>] vzquota_inode_data+0xb3/0xf0 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c449>] vzquota_inode_init_call+0x19/0x80 [vzdquota]
 [<021fb940>] ext3_delete_inode+0x0/0x120
 [<ed79e47f>] vzquota_initialize+0xf/0x20 [vzdquota]
 [<0219d983>] generic_delete_inode+0x173/0x190
 [<021996f6>] dput_recursive+0x56/0x230
 [<0217f333>] __fput+0x123/0x1b0
 [<0217d4c2>] filp_close+0x52/0xa0
 [<0217d57a>] sys_close+0x6a/0xa0
VZDQ: detached inode not in creation, orig 5, dev dm-0, inode 73827282, fs ext3
current 8753 (mysqld), VE 102, time 77463.644383
 [<ed79c296>] vzquota_det_qmblk_recalc+0x256/0x270 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c302>] vzquota_inode_qmblk_recalc+0x52/0x70 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c573>] vzquota_inode_data+0xb3/0xf0 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c449>] vzquota_inode_init_call+0x19/0x80 [vzdquota]
 [<021fb940>] ext3_delete_inode+0x0/0x120
 [<ed79e47f>] vzquota_initialize+0xf/0x20 [vzdquota]
 [<0219d983>] generic_delete_inode+0x173/0x190
 [<021996f6>] dput_recursive+0x56/0x230
 [<0217f333>] __fput+0x123/0x1b0
 [<0217d4c2>] filp_close+0x52/0xa0
 [<0212e17a>] put_files_struct+0x6a/0xf0
 [<0212f6d0>] do_exit+0x1b0/0x560
 [<02138665>] __dequeue_signal+0x115/0x210
 [<0212fb60>] do_group_exit+0x40/0xb0
 [<0213ab3b>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x2ab/0x410
 [<0210877b>] do_signal+0x9b/0x180
 [<02194f04>] sys_select+0x444/0x530
 [<0210ab6d>] handle_IRQ_event+0x5d/0xb0
 [<02108897>] do_notify_resume+0x37/0x40
VZDQ: detached inode not in creation, orig 5, dev dm-0, inode 73828028, fs ext3
current 8753 (mysqld), VE 102, time 77463.652955
 [<ed79c296>] vzquota_det_qmblk_recalc+0x256/0x270 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c302>] vzquota_inode_qmblk_recalc+0x52/0x70 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c573>] vzquota_inode_data+0xb3/0xf0 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c449>] vzquota_inode_init_call+0x19/0x80 [vzdquota]
 [<021fb940>] ext3_delete_inode+0x0/0x120
 [<ed79e47f>] vzquota_initialize+0xf/0x20 [vzdquota]
 [<0219d983>] generic_delete_inode+0x173/0x190
 [<021996f6>] dput_recursive+0x56/0x230
 [<0217f333>] __fput+0x123/0x1b0
 [<0217d4c2>] filp_close+0x52/0xa0
 [<0212e17a>] put_files_struct+0x6a/0xf0
 [<0212f6d0>] do_exit+0x1b0/0x560
 [<02138665>] __dequeue_signal+0x115/0x210
 [<0212fb60>] do_group_exit+0x40/0xb0
 [<0213ab3b>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x2ab/0x410
 [<0210877b>] do_signal+0x9b/0x180
 [<02194f04>] sys_select+0x444/0x530
 [<0210ab6d>] handle_IRQ_event+0x5d/0xb0
 [<02108897>] do_notify_resume+0x37/0x40
VZDQ: detached inode not in creation, orig 5, dev dm-0, inode 73828029, fs ext3
current 8753 (mysqld), VE 102, time 77463.661461
 [<ed79c296>] vzquota_det_qmblk_recalc+0x256/0x270 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c302>] vzquota_inode_qmblk_recalc+0x52/0x70 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c573>] vzquota_inode_data+0xb3/0xf0 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c449>] vzquota_inode_init_call+0x19/0x80 [vzdquota]
 [<021fb940>] ext3_delete_inode+0x0/0x120
 [<ed79e47f>] vzquota_initialize+0xf/0x20 [vzdquota]
 [<0219d983>] generic_delete_inode+0x173/0x190
 [<021996f6>] dput_recursive+0x56/0x230
 [<0217f333>] __fput+0x123/0x1b0
 [<0217d4c2>] filp_close+0x52/0xa0
 [<0212e17a>] put_files_struct+0x6a/0xf0
 [<0212f6d0>] do_exit+0x1b0/0x560
 [<02138665>] __dequeue_signal+0x115/0x210
 [<0212fb60>] do_group_exit+0x40/0xb0
 [<0213ab3b>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x2ab/0x410
 [<0210877b>] do_signal+0x9b/0x180
 [<02194f04>] sys_select+0x444/0x530
 [<0210ab6d>] handle_IRQ_event+0x5d/0xb0
 [<02108897>] do_notify_resume+0x37/0x40
VZDQ: detached inode not in creation, orig 5, dev dm-0, inode 73828038, fs ext3
current 8753 (mysqld), VE 102, time 77463.671746
 [<ed79c296>] vzquota_det_qmblk_recalc+0x256/0x270 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c302>] vzquota_inode_qmblk_recalc+0x52/0x70 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c573>] vzquota_inode_data+0xb3/0xf0 [vzdquota]
 [<ed79c449>] vzquota_inode_init_call+0x19/0x80 [vzdquota]
 [<021fb940>] ext3_delete_inode+0x0/0x120
 [<ed79e47f>] vzquota_initialize+0xf/0x20 [vzdquota]
 [<0219d983>] generic_delete_inode+0x173/0x190
 [<021996f6>] dput_recursive+0x56/0x230
 [<0217f333>] __fput+0x123/0x1b0
 [<0217d4c2>] filp_close+0x52/0xa0
 [<0212e17a>] put_files_struct+0x6a/0xf0
 [<0212f6d0>] do_exit+0x1b0/0x560
 [<02138665>] __dequeue_signal+0x115/0x210
 [<0212fb60>] do_group_exit+0x40/0xb0
 [<0213ab3b>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x2ab/0x410
 [<0210877b>] do_signal+0x9b/0x180
 [<02194f04>] sys_select+0x444/0x530
 [<0210ab6d>] handle_IRQ_event+0x5d/0xb0
 [<02108897>] do_notify_resume+0x37/0x40
VPS: 102: stopped
VPS: 102: started
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
Fatal resource shortage: privvmpages, UB 102.
VPS: 102: stopped
VPS: 102: started
VPS: 102: stopped
VPS: 102: started
VPS: 102: stopped
VPS: 102: started


Indeed, this VE loaded Bind, Apache (mod_security and other modules..), MySQL, PostgreSQL, Postfix, Cyrus IMAP, vsftp, denyhosts, ..

The occurrence of problem is really unpredictable. What i m guilty of is that it could be due to my poor configuration over those daemons.. Sometime during ftp, i get this problem.. Right now i was thinking to turn off mod_security which i suspect the most and according to apache error log.

I dont mind to pm this VE login details. Please let me know if you might need sudoer. So that i will create temp account and add in to wheel group for temporary..

thanks....

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-user.png

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8219 is a reply to message #8153] Fri, 10 November 2006 16:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member
When it happens again, please do the following:
in VE0 (host system) run:
# top
then press 'M'
After that 'top' will show you most memory consuming proccesses first. The column 'RSS' shows you how much memory proccess has.
Please post it here and try to kill the offending processes. It should help.

BTW, how much RAM do you have on the node?

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-developer.png

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8264 is a reply to message #8134] Mon, 13 November 2006 01:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
victorskl is currently offline  victorskl
Messages: 28
Registered: September 2006
Junior Member
Thanks again.

I will debug and post it asap. For now, i turn off XSS setting in mod_security and this VE seem quiet.

HN have Ram 4G and Swap 8G.. but by following vzsplit, it end up with 

vmguarpages           0          0     620896 2147483647


That's another question i'd like to ask also. It seem from this point onwards, if i want to increase guarantee ram i have to manually increase pages? bec vzsplit end at 620896 pages which splitting around 16 VEs. If i split 10 VEs only, vmguarpages won't increase anymore than 620896 pages but other parameters such as cpu power increase accordingly.

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-user.png

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8274 is a reply to message #8264] Mon, 13 November 2006 09:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member
ok. it could be a memory leak in mod_security... Report it if it happens again.

how did you run vzsplit (i.e. command line options)?

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-developer.png

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8281 is a reply to message #8134] Mon, 13 November 2006 15:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
victorskl is currently offline  victorskl
Messages: 28
Registered: September 2006
Junior Member
Sure.. I will follow up with Apache and mod_security community.

For vzsplit, yes i'm using command line vzsplit to perform the initial equal-shared VE splitting. After that i tune(increase/decrease) according to HN's capability/handling and how much VEs this HN can offer. So that i can get some initial point for packaging respect to quota and traffic accounting.


Rolling Eyes

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-user.png

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8283 is a reply to message #8281] Mon, 13 November 2006 16:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member
Sorry, looks like we don't get each other Smile
can you rephrase your question about vzsplit please?

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-developer.png

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8285 is a reply to message #8134] Mon, 13 November 2006 17:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
victorskl is currently offline  victorskl
Messages: 28
Registered: September 2006
Junior Member
Very Happy

Yap.. sorry might be off topic..

- Yes, i split VE using command line vzsplit. So, I split 20, 40, 80 etc and i have those config files.

- The resource parameters are changing(decrease/increase) according to the amount of VE that i splitting..

- But start from splitting around 17 onward lower value, i.e.. 16, 15, 14,..., 10

- vmguarpages parameters wont increase from barrier 620736 pages. It still showing barrier 620736 pages on 17, and 16, ..., 10 config files.

- But cpuunits/other parameters increase/decrease accordingly on this situation.

Please have a look these splitted config files.

# Configuration file generated by vzsplit for 40 VPS
# on HN with total amount of physical mem 4042 Mb
# low memory 3274 Mb, swap size 8063 Mb, Max treads 8000
# Resourse commit level 0:
# Free resource distribution. Any parameters may be increased
# Primary parameters
NUMPROC="418:418"
AVNUMPROC="209:209"
NUMTCPSOCK="418:418"
NUMOTHERSOCK="418:418"
VMGUARPAGES="68777:2147483647"

# Secondary parameters
KMEMSIZE="17166725:18883397"
TCPSNDBUF="4010113:5722241"
TCPRCVBUF="4010113:5722241"
OTHERSOCKBUF="2005056:3717184"
DGRAMRCVBUF="2005056:2005056"
OOMGUARPAGES="68777:2147483647"
PRIVVMPAGES="412662:453928"

# Auxiliary parameters
LOCKEDPAGES="838:838"
SHMPAGES="41266:41266"
PHYSPAGES="0:2147483647"
NUMFILE="6688:6688"
NUMFLOCK="668:734"
NUMPTY="41:41"
NUMSIGINFO="1024:1024"
DCACHESIZE="3740085:3852288"
NUMIPTENT="50:50"
DISKSPACE="1666190:1832810"
DISKINODES="860512:946564"
CPUUNITS="7808"



# Configuration file generated by vzsplit for 20 VEs
# on HN with total amount of physical mem 4041 Mb
# low memory 3273 Mb, swap size 8063 Mb, Max treads 8000
# Resourse commit level 0:
# Free resource distribution. Any parameters may be increased
# Primary parameters
NUMPROC="836:836"
AVNUMPROC="418:418"
NUMTCPSOCK="836:836"
NUMOTHERSOCK="836:836"
VMGUARPAGES="620736:2147483647"

# Secondary parameters
KMEMSIZE="34322554:37754809"
TCPSNDBUF="8016595:11440851"
TCPRCVBUF="8016595:11440851"
OTHERSOCKBUF="4008297:7432553"
DGRAMRCVBUF="4008297:4008297"
OOMGUARPAGES="620736:2147483647"
PRIVVMPAGES="620736:682809"

# Auxiliary parameters
LOCKEDPAGES="1675:1675"
SHMPAGES="62073:62073"
PHYSPAGES="0:2147483647"
NUMFILE="13376:13376"
NUMFLOCK="1000:1100"
NUMPTY="83:83"
NUMSIGINFO="1024:1024"
DCACHESIZE="7480170:7704576"
NUMIPTENT="100:100"
DISKSPACE="3332381:3665620"
DISKINODES="1721025:1893128"
CPUUNITS="15242"



# Configuration file generated by vzsplit for 10 VEs
# on HN with total amount of physical mem 4041 Mb
# low memory 3273 Mb, swap size 8063 Mb, Max treads 8000
# Resourse commit level 0:
# Free resource distribution. Any parameters may be increased
# Primary parameters
NUMPROC="1674:1674"
AVNUMPROC="837:837"
NUMTCPSOCK="1674:1674"
NUMOTHERSOCK="1674:1674"
VMGUARPAGES="620736:2147483647"

# Secondary parameters
KMEMSIZE="68645109:75509619"
TCPSNDBUF="16024999:22881703"
TCPRCVBUF="16024999:22881703"
OTHERSOCKBUF="8012499:14869203"
DGRAMRCVBUF="8012499:8012499"
OOMGUARPAGES="620736:2147483647"
PRIVVMPAGES="620736:682809"

# Auxiliary parameters
LOCKEDPAGES="3351:3351"
SHMPAGES="62073:62073"
PHYSPAGES="0:2147483647"
NUMFILE="26784:26784"
NUMFLOCK="1000:1100"
NUMPTY="167:167"
NUMSIGINFO="1024:1024"
DCACHESIZE="14978236:15427584"
NUMIPTENT="200:200"
DISKSPACE="6664763:7331240"
DISKINODES="3442051:3786257"
CPUUNITS="29100"


So compare the last two config, 20 and 10, all other parameters increase/decrease accordingly but VMGUARPAGES, PRIVVMPAGES, OOMGUARPAGES barrier parameters are not. So, my question is
- i have to manually set the amount OR
- is this normal and i'm missing something OR
- vzsplit can not split more than 2G+ of RAM OR
- the rest of RAM(around 1.5G+) reserved for HN?

But of course, i wont offer or package more than 2G+ for VPS hosting.. I just curious to know at least.

Thanks
Smile

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-user.png

[Updated on: Mon, 13 November 2006 17:08]

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8287 is a reply to message #8285] Mon, 13 November 2006 17:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member
AFAICS, it it as follows:

vmguarpages = 620736 = 620736*4 Mb = 2.482 GB
so, for 10 VEs it have allocated 24.82GBs which is overcommitment equal to x2 (you have 4+8 = 12GB total). AFAICS, vzsplit tries to keep overcommitment bound.

also you can always check your configs with vzcfgvalidate after any manual changes.

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-developer.png

Report message to a moderator

Re: optimization on privvmpages failcnt [message #8289 is a reply to message #8134] Mon, 13 November 2006 18:57 Go to previous message
victorskl is currently offline  victorskl
Messages: 28
Registered: September 2006
Junior Member
Wow.. Very Happy
Thanks.. This is clear all my doubts and lack of leveling.. Now i know how to ride the horse!!

http://static.openvz.org/userbars/openvz-user.png

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: rsync problem
Next Topic: *SOLVED* Disc disappear from fstab
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Nov 15 17:23:42 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03207 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers