OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [Q] missing unused dentry in prune_dcache()?
Re: [Q] missing unused dentry in prune_dcache()? [message #7786 is a reply to message #7784] Wed, 25 October 2006 13:58 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
vaverin is currently offline  vaverin
Messages: 708
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
David Howells wrote:
> Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru> wrote:
>> The patch adds this dentry into tail of the dentry_unused list.
>
> I think that's reasonable. I wonder if we can avoid removing it from the list
> in the first place, but I suspect it's less optimal.

Could you please explain this place in details, I do not understand why tail of
the list is better than head.
Also I do not understand why we should go to out in this case. Why we cannot use
next dentry in the list instead?

> Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>


Thank you,
Vasily Averin
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH]: OOM can panic due to processes stuck in __alloc_pages()
Next Topic: [PATCH] move_task_off_dead_cpu() should be called with disabled ints
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Aug 24 13:26:14 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.10019 seconds