OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC] network namespaces
Re: Re: [RFC] network namespaces [message #6147 is a reply to message #6142] Sun, 10 September 2006 02:47 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Herbert Poetzl is currently offline  Herbert Poetzl
Messages: 239
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:57:24AM +0400, Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> On Friday 08 September 2006 22:11, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > actually the light-weight ip isolation runs perfectly
> > fine _without_ CAP_NET_ADMIN, as you do not want the
> > guest to be able to mess with the 'configured' ips at
> > all (not to speak of interfaces here)

> It was only an example. I'm thinking about how to implement flexible
> solution, which permits light-weight ip isolation as well as
> full-fledged netwrok virtualization. Another solution is to split
> CONFIG_NET_NAMESPACE. Is it good for you?

well, I think it would be best to have both, as
they are complementary to some degree, and IMHO
both, the full virtualization _and_ the isolation
will require a separate namespace to work, I also
think that limiting the isolation to something
very simple (like one IP + network or so) would
be acceptable for a start, because especially
multi IP or network range checks require a little
more efford to get them right ...

I do not think that folks would want to recompile
their kernel just to get a light-weight guest or
a fully virtualized one

best,
Herbert

> --
> Thanks,
> Dmitry.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 2.6.18] ext2: errors behaviour fix
Next Topic: 64bit DMA in i2o_block
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jul 18 06:34:02 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03430 seconds