OpenVZ Forum: Devel » Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2]

Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2]

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2] [message #6066]

Thu, 07 September 2006 15:37

dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow

Senior Member

> Here's a stab at semantics for how to handle file access. Should be
> pretty simple to implement, but i won't get a chance to implement this
> week.
>
> At mount, by default the vfsmount is tagged with a uid_ns.
> A new -o uid_ns=<pid> option instead tags the vfsmount with the uid_ns
> belonging to pid <pid>. Since any process in a descendent pid
> namespace should still have a valid pid in the ancestor
> pidspaces, this should work fine.
> At vfs_permission, if current->nsproxy->uid_ns != file->f_vfsmnt->uid_ns,
> 1. If file is owned by root, then read permission is granted
> 2. If file is owned by non-root, no permission is granted
> (regardless of process uid)
>
> Does this sound reasonable?
imho this in acceptable for OpenVZ as makes VE files to be inaccessiable from
host. At least this is how I understand your idea...
Am I correct?

> I assume the list of other things we'll need to consider includes
> signals between user namespaces
> keystore
> sys_setpriority and the like
> I might argue that all of these should be sufficiently protected
> by proper setup by userspace. Can you explain why that is not
> the case?
The same requirement (ability to send signals from host to VE)
is also applicable to signals.

Thanks,
Kirill

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2] By: dev on Thu, 07 September 2006 15:37
		Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2] By: Herbert Poetzl on Thu, 07 September 2006 15:48
		Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2] By: dev on Thu, 07 September 2006 16:05
		Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2] By: Herbert Poetzl on Thu, 07 September 2006 17:55
		Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2] By: dev on Tue, 12 September 2006 13:48
		Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2] By: Herbert Poetzl on Tue, 12 September 2006 14:07
		Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] user namespace [try #2] By: serue on Thu, 07 September 2006 15:53

Previous Topic:	[S390] update fs3270 to use a struct pid
Next Topic:	Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] add user namespace [try #2]

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Sep 19 07:06:01 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.09068 seconds