| Re: ATM support...? [message #5839 is a reply to message #5830] |
Fri, 01 September 2006 10:10   |
john.robinson
Messages: 3
Registered: September 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
- I didn't include logs 'cos I'd already diagnosed the problem (missing ATM support). "Not properly" in this case means startup hung trying to start ppp0.
- Sorry, my bad; shouldn't compare the output of `ls` (i.e. packaged size) with the output of `rpm -qi` (i.e. expanded size).
- Yes, I will do, but that was rather the point of my post: is there any particular reason the OpenVZ kernel rpms for RHEL4/CentOS4 aren't built as drop-in replacements for the original distribution kernels?
- Not necessary, no, but there's no need for the kernel-devel component on non-development machines - specifically, server machines - and that's why CentOS and Fedora bundle the kernel and kernel-devel separately, so in the same vein as before, why doesn't the OpenVZ project bundle things the same?
Cheers, John.
|
|
|
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
