OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: [Vserver] VServer vs OpenVZ
Re: Re: [Vserver] VServer vs OpenVZ [message #496 is a reply to message #495] Sun, 11 December 2005 20:09 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
TheWiseOne is currently offline  TheWiseOne
Messages: 66
Registered: September 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Member
> The kernel caches based on inode number. If you modified the caching
> part of the module then I may be incorrect in my thinking. Take example:
>
> # ls -ai /vz/private/1/root/bin/ls
> 41361462 /vz/private/1/root/bin/ls
> # ls -ai /vz/template/redhat-as3-minimal/coreutils-4.5.3-26/bin/ls
> 1998864 /vz/template/redhat-as3-minimal/coreutils-4.5.3-26/bin/ls
> # ls -ai /vz/root/1/bin/ls
> 41361462 /vz/root/1/bin/ls
>

This may actually be an error. This new info was on a linked file
(using templates). I tried on a VPS that has broken the link and found
this:

# ls -ali /vz/private/101/root/bin/ls
245325878 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 67700 Sep 29 11:42
/vz/private/101/root/bin/ls
# ls -ali /vz/root/101/bin/ls
245325878 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 67700 Sep 29 11:42
/vz/root/101/bin/ls

Or - the third thought is that we are better off not using the CoW/vzfs
part of Virtuozzo at all and OpenVZ is a more scalable alternative to
Virtuozzo.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [ANNOUNCE] first stable release of OpenVZ kernel virtualization solution
Next Topic: simple_pin_fs issue
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Mon Apr 13 15:00:36 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.36780 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers