OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » containers and cgroups mini-summit @ Linux Plumbers
Re: Re: containers and cgroups mini-summit @ Linux Plumbers [message #47293 is a reply to message #47289] Thu, 26 July 2012 18:15 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Tejun Heo is currently offline  Tejun Heo
Messages: 184
Registered: November 2006
Senior Member
Hello, Eric.

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:42:50AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> - Create a new mount namespace.
> - Create fresh mounts of all of the control groups like I would do at
> boot, with no consideration to any other control group state.
> - Start forking processes.
>
> The expected semantics would be something like chroot for control
> groups, where all of the control groups that are created by fresh mounts
> are relative to whatever state the process of being in a control group
> that the process that mounted them was in.

No, any attempt to build namespace support into cgroup core code will
be nacked with strong prejudice. I still think it was a mistake to
add that to sysfs. Thankfully, procfs is going the FUSE way and I
hope in time we could convert sysfs to a similar mechanism and
deprecate the in-kernel support.

So, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. :P

--
tejun
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 00/10] memcg kmem limitation - slab.
Next Topic: [PATCH 00/11] kmem controller for memcg: stripped down version
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Aug 15 03:26:01 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.74142 seconds