Re: OpenVZ vs. VMware [message #4718 is a reply to message #4689] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 10:05 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/ovz3/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to previous message](/theme/ovz3/images/down.png) |
cdevidal
Messages: 24 Registered: June 2006 Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Junior Member |
|
|
[quote title=n00b_admin wrote on Fri, 21 July 2006 13:14]i am willing to spend a little more bucks on a powerful machine than in a courthouse because some punk kid broke into my server [quote]
Wow.
You might consider renting a dedicated server, they're real cheep now. ServerPronto.com has $29.95/month servers! APlus.net has $49/month servers...
n00b_admin wrote on Fri, 21 July 2006 13:14 | My plan was to divide the physical resources of my hosting machine, so that all clients get an equal share,
|
Yeah you probably want OpenVZ/Virtuozzo then. VMware adds so much overhead but VZ should balance everyone out fairly and evenly.
n00b_admin wrote on Fri, 21 July 2006 13:14 | i stop worrying about security (because i can restore a vps almost instantly), i can make back-ups without interrupting the service and much more (i sense there's more to discover )
|
You might look at LVM and/or EVMS; I understand they can do snapshots which would give you a consistent backup -- no locked or changing files.
R U good enough?
TenThousandDollarOffer.com
[Updated on: Sat, 22 July 2006 10:10] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|