> I don't know about cpusets in details, but at least with NUMA, this is not an
> apple-to-apple comparison. a NUMA node is not meant to contain you. A
> container is, and that is why it is called a container.
Cpusets contains sets of nodes. A cpusets "contains" nodes. These sets are
associated with applications.
> NUMA just means what is the *best* node to put my memory.
> Now, if you actually say, through you syscalls "this is the node it should
> live in", then you have a constraint, that to the best of my knowledge is
> respected.
Eith cpusets it means that memory needs to come from an assigned set of
nodes.
> Now isolation here, is done in the container boundary. (cgroups, to be
> generic).
Yes and with cpusets it is done at the cpuset boundary. Very much the
same.
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
