[PATCH 0/3] SUNRPC: three bugfixes for PipeFS event handling [message #45968] |
Fri, 20 April 2012 14:18  |
Stanislav Kinsbursky
Messages: 683 Registered: October 2011
|
Senior Member |
|
|
These bugfixes were caught (or noticed) due to the following simple script:
============================================================ ==========
#!/bin/bash
service rpcbind stop
service rpcidmapd stop
killall -TERM rpc.statd
umount /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs
rmmod nfs
service rpcbind start
service nfs start
mount -t rpc_pipefs sunrpc /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs
============================================================ ===========
The following series consists of:
---
Stanislav Kinsbursky (3):
SUNRPC: skip clients with program without PipeFS entries
SUNRPC: traverse clients tree on PipeFS event
SUNRPC: set per-net PipeFS superblock before notification
net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/3] SUNRPC: three bugfixes for PipeFS event handling [message #46098 is a reply to message #46097] |
Wed, 25 April 2012 21:02  |
bfields
Messages: 107 Registered: September 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:59:07AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 25.04.2012 22:24, J. Bruce Fields написал:
> >On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:18:59PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >>These bugfixes were caught (or noticed) due to the following simple script:
> >I'm assuming Trond should take these (possibly for 3.4?).
>
> I think so.
> But would be great if you'll take them as well (since I'm mostly
> working with your tree).
> Of course, only if its not a big deal for you.
> But if there will be any conflicts - then don't worry. I can just
> keep these patches in my repo.
If it's a bugfix that should go to 3.4, then best might be for Trond to
get it merged, then I'll pull it into my tree after that.
Or I'm happy to do it some other way if someone prefers.
--b.
|
|
|