OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Users » RE: lvm and openvz
Re: Re: lvm and openvz [message #45690 is a reply to message #45689] Thu, 29 March 2012 09:09 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Brown is currently offline  David Brown
Messages: 5
Registered: March 2012
Junior Member
On 29/03/2012 11:04, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 11:49 AM, David Brown wrote:
>>
>> I /really/ wish the openvz developers would move beyond kernel
>> 2.6.32 - kernal 2.6.33 introduced snapshot merging to LVM which
>> would play wonderfully with this setup.
>
> I'm not sure why people think that RHEL6 kernel is pure 2.6.32. It is
> definitely not!
>
> For snapshot merging, I am not an expert here but googling for 'rhel6
> lvm snapshot merging' gave me this:
>
> http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/rhel6/rhel_6_lvm_admi n/rhel_6_lvm_snapshot_merge.html
>
>
>
> and this:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/solutions/58510
>
> Both articles suggest RHEL6 kernel supports LVM snapshot merging, and
> so should OpenVZ RHEL6-based kernel.
>
> PS If you are using non-rhel6 openvz kernel, it's definitely time to
> switch, and lots of reasons to do that besides LVM snapshot merging.
> Notable things are vswap, ploop, stability...
>
> Kir.

I am using a non-rhel6 openvz kernel because I don't use RHEL - I use
Debian on my servers. Are you suggesting that I should specifically use
the RHEL6 openvz kernel even though I use Debian? That's something I
haven't thought of trying, but if it is the recommendation of the OpenVZ
developers, then I will give it a shot.

More generally, I would hope that one day OpenVZ will change over to
following the current kernel (or perhaps the current long-term support
kernels) - there has been a lot of development since 2.6.32, not all of
which gets backported by Red Hat. I'd expect that a lot of OpenVZ code
can be merged with or replaced by the container support in later
kernels. I also think that if OpenVZ doesn't catch up, then people will
migrate to other solutions such as Linux VServer or LXC (I know I
considered it for the last server I configured).

Of course, I fully appreciate that something like that takes a lot of
effort, and that means time, money, people to do the work, testing,
etc., etc. But one can still hope!

David
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: ploop
Next Topic: Hornet Queue (jboss) vs sever resource shortage
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 16 09:25:06 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02794 seconds