Home » Mailing lists » Users » Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production [message #44200 is a reply to message #44185] |
Thu, 24 November 2011 09:44   |
Dariush Pietrzak
Messages: 40 Registered: November 2007
|
Member |
|
|
> Have you reopened it already? Can you provide bug number?
BUG 2080.
I reopened, got told that that is completely different issue, then
encountered exactly the same issue on supposedly fixed kernel,
so reopened again.
> Any other statements like
> "there are many bugs", "this kernel is unstable" are just not
> specific enough for me to deal with.
That's why I wanted to provide a way to reproduce the problem, I would
imagine that overnight stresstest would already be a part of your internal
QA.
This got through our own QA probably because we were running only
'stress' app, only when we added parallel bonnie+ ( which we did, because
production machines that were crashing all had significant IO on them as
common thing ).
> If there are bugs, they need to be reported and fixed, and we,
> OpenVZ team, partly rely on you, our users. We do have internal QA
> but can't possibly test all the use cases and scenarios.
>
> Specifically, we rely on having bug reports from you, with full
> kernel logs (see http://wiki.openvz.org/Remote_console_setup), test
> cases (as specific and reproducible as possible), and ideally your
> ability to test patches that developers provide and report your
> results back to bugzilla.
>
> We treat bug reports very seriously, and we do our best to reproduce
> your bugs locally and fix them. Again, please be specific and refer
Thats very nice and correct, can you please tell me if the issue I can
see here has been reproduced and is too hard to fix, or maybe it's not
reproducible, and then, how can I help in reproducing them.
As I said, from my point of view, the issue is trivially reproducible,
results in crashes manifesting themselves in few different ways, so I
assume that means multiple different bugs, or something more fundamental.
best regards, Eyck
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
Total Existance Failure
|
|
|
 |
|
Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
By: kir on Tue, 22 November 2011 10:34
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
By: kir on Wed, 23 November 2011 14:42
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
By: kir on Wed, 23 November 2011 17:13
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
By: kir on Wed, 23 November 2011 20:29
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
By: Sharp on Wed, 23 November 2011 17:20
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
 |
|
Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Jul 01 09:18:41 GMT 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05037 seconds
|