OpenVZ Forum: Users » Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production

Home » Mailing lists » Users » Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production [message #44157]

Tue, 22 November 2011 08:52

Dariush Pietrzak
Messages: 40
Registered: November 2007

Member

Hello,
since 2.6.32 branch is no longer maintained:
"
Also, from now (30 August 2011) we no longer maintain the following kernel branches:

* 2.6.27
* 2.6.32
"
we have switched to RHEL6 branch, which seems to run fine, and solves some
long-running problems with 2.6.32 ( vSwap, problem with accounting of
mmaped files usage ).
All was nice until some heavier loaded servers came online with RHEL6, and
- they started crashing. And then came the upgrade train:
stab036.1 => stab037.1 => stab039.10 => stab040.1 => stab042.1 etc

With one of the problems we caught, we were told to switch from stable to
testing kernels ( now I see that that testing kernel later became stable,
so while confusing, it makes some sense ).
All those kernels ( and stab039.11, which from description should be
latest stable ) exhibit the same problem/class of problems - when put under
stress, they crash.
It's quite easy to recreate, now that we've spent some time tracking it down,
just start the machine with for example:

stress --cpu 12 --io 16 --vm 32 -d 24 --hdd-bytes 10G
and maybe bonnie++ running in loop, and in few minutes/few hours you've got
dead machines spewing something like:

[ 1515.249585] BUG: scheduling while atomic: stress/2054/0xffff8800
[ 1515.250189] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffc047118e0
[ 1515.250189] IP: [<ffffffff8105620e>] account_system_time+0x9e/0x1f0
[ 1515.250189] PGD 1a27067 PUD 0
[ 1515.250189] Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted
[ 1515.250189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP

or maybe:
[ 1876.747809] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000006000000bd
[ 1876.747815] IP: [<ffffffff8105a4fe>] select_task_rq_fair+0x32e/0xa20
[ 1876.747823] PGD 12d089067 PUD 0
[ 1876.747826] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP

or
[38764.623677] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 000000000001e440
[38764.623677] IP: [<ffffffff814c8efe>] _spin_lock+0xe/0x30
[38764.623677] PGD 12c7b4067 PUD 12c7b5067 PMD 0
[38764.623677] Oops: 0002 [#2] SMP
[38764.623677] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/virtual/block/ram9/stat
[38764.623677] CPU 1
or sometimes strangely affecting HP smart array, and causing it to
disconnect it's raids ( I don't understand how that's possible, but it
doesn't happen with old openvz )

Under the same load, classic 2.6.32-openvz kernels do just fine ( although
my personal feeling is that rhel6 is way more snappy under such a load ).

It usually takes less then few hours for rhel6 kernel to crash, although
with lighter load it might take weeks or months.

Should we continue testing 'stable' branch, or maybe fixes are more likely
to be expected in testing 042.x?

best regards, Eyck
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
Total Existance Failure

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Dariush Pietrzak on Tue, 22 November 2011 08:52
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: kir on Tue, 22 November 2011 10:34
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: MailingListe on Wed, 23 November 2011 10:52
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Dariush Pietrzak on Wed, 23 November 2011 12:31
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: kir on Wed, 23 November 2011 14:42
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: MailingListe on Wed, 23 November 2011 15:21
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: MailingListe on Wed, 23 November 2011 16:59
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: kir on Wed, 23 November 2011 17:13
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: MailingListe on Wed, 23 November 2011 17:25
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: kir on Wed, 23 November 2011 20:29
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Sharp on Wed, 23 November 2011 17:20
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Dariush Pietrzak on Thu, 24 November 2011 09:44
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: MailingListe on Thu, 24 November 2011 11:27
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Dariush Pietrzak on Thu, 24 November 2011 12:15
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: MailingListe on Fri, 25 November 2011 09:39
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Dariush Pietrzak on Fri, 25 November 2011 13:26
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Dariush Pietrzak on Wed, 30 November 2011 09:34
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Stephen Balukoff on Thu, 01 December 2011 22:03
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Stephen Balukoff on Thu, 01 December 2011 22:06
		Re: Is there a stable OpenVZ kernel, and which should be fit for production By: Stephen Balukoff on Fri, 02 December 2011 00:39

Previous Topic:	openvz CT migration filesystem on share storage
Next Topic:	OpenVZ Container with a PCI ISDN Card

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 31 16:13:48 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.21883 seconds