I don't think splitting stable and development as separate branches means RHEL6 is not stable. It's exactly the same format they used on RHEL5 and it worked.

I found that many of the "testing" kernels on RHEL5 were as stable as the "stable" kernels (sometimes more so). But the fact is, RHEL6 is very stable and production quality. I have two machines (25.1 and 37.1) which have no problems. 36.6 does have some bite to it though.

The real question is why does yum update vzkernel try to download 39.3 when 37.1 is the latest stable. And why does it try to download a kernel that isn't stable. It seems to me that yum update vzkernel should do the right thing, whatever the developers feel that is.

Seems the repo might need some work.

Great job on RHEL6 though!

sean