| 
		
			| help: squezze [message #43817] | Tue, 18 October 2011 08:54  |  
			| 
				
				
					|  <dmacharashvili Messages: 3
 Registered: October 2011
 | Junior Member |  |  |  
	| Hi All! 
 
 
 A want to upgrade my openvz host on debian squezze. When I run "aptitude
 upgrade,"  it shows me to upgrade base kernel too. Is it recommended? Or is
 there a way to  exclude original kernel from upgrades?
 
 
 
 apt-get upgrade
 Reading package lists... Done
 Building dependency tree
 Reading state information... Done
 The following packages will be upgraded:
 aptitude base-files ca-certificates firmware-linux-free grub-common grub-pc
 libgssapi-krb5-2 libgssrpc4 libk5crypto3 libkadm5clnt-mit7 libkadm5srv-mit7
 libkdb5-4 libkrb5-3 libkrb5support0 libssl0.9.8 linux-base
 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 openssh-client
 openssh-server
 openssl tzdata usbutils
 23 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
 Need to get 69.8 MB of archives.
 After this operation, 7,168 kB disk space will be freed.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Best Regards!
 
 
 
 Davit Macharashvli
 
 dmacharashvili@geonet.ge
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 
 Users mailing list
 
 Users@openvz.org
 
 https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re:  vps settings [message #44106 is a reply to message #44105] | Wed, 16 November 2011 16:20   |  
			| 
				
				
					|  Sharp Messages: 14
 Registered: March 2011
 | Junior Member |  |  |  
	| On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:49 PM,  <lst_hoe02@kwsoft.de> wrote: > I doubt most "starters" will install a kernel of their choice but use a
 > distribution like Debian 6 with OpenVZ kernel included. Maybe you can tell
 > how to find out if the kernel used supports vSwap?
 
 It should be 2.6.32 and the HN should probably be RHEL6 (or its
 derivative like SL6/CentOS6). If it's debian -- the user should
 install RHEL6's kernel (there was a discussion in the neighbor thread
 about debian and proxmox kernel [1]) because debian's kernel don't
 have vswap support (that's AFAIR).
 
 Personally, I don't get that thing: using debian as HN. OpenVZ ships
 their kernel for RHEL and tests them on RHEL, all the features goes
 there first before debian guys will incorporate them into their
 kernel. So, maybe it's a good idea to use RHEL as your HN just to
 minimize your work, wouldn't you think so? And if you hate RHEL so
 much -- hey, it's just the HN, you can do a bazillions of debian CTs
 there.
 
 So, I would never recommend debian as a HN.
 
 [1] http://openvz.org/pipermail/users/2011-November/004324.html
 
 --
 SY, Ilya A. Otyutskiy aka Sharp
 |  
	|  |  | 
	| 
		
			| Re:  vps settings [message #44107 is a reply to message #44106] | Wed, 16 November 2011 17:20  |  
			| 
				
				
					|  MailingListe Messages: 29
 Registered: May 2008
 | Junior Member |  |  |  
	| Zitat von "Ilya A. Otyutskiy" <sharp@thesharp.ru>: 
 > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:49 PM,  <lst_hoe02@kwsoft.de> wrote:
 >> I doubt most "starters" will install a kernel of their choice but use a
 >> distribution like Debian 6 with OpenVZ kernel included. Maybe you can tell
 >> how to find out if the kernel used supports vSwap?
 >
 > It should be 2.6.32 and the HN should probably be RHEL6 (or its
 > derivative like SL6/CentOS6). If it's debian -- the user should
 > install RHEL6's kernel (there was a discussion in the neighbor thread
 > about debian and proxmox kernel [1]) because debian's kernel don't
 > have vswap support (that's AFAIR).
 >
 > Personally, I don't get that thing: using debian as HN. OpenVZ ships
 > their kernel for RHEL and tests them on RHEL, all the features goes
 > there first before debian guys will incorporate them into their
 > kernel. So, maybe it's a good idea to use RHEL as your HN just to
 > minimize your work, wouldn't you think so? And if you hate RHEL so
 > much -- hey, it's just the HN, you can do a bazillions of debian CTs
 > there.
 >
 > So, I would never recommend debian as a HN.
 
 No one like to use every distribution available and multiple OS in
 corperate environment, as with every flavor the management get more
 taxing as you for sure already know. If you are a RHEL using company,
 fine. But if the only RHEL running systems would be the HN(s) it is
 simply not the preferred choice. That might be one of the reasons for
 the hype about LXC, to not get sticked with one special distribution
 to get the most of it.
 
 As always YMMV
 
 Regards
 
 Andreas
 
	
	 Attachment: smime.p7s (Size: 6.03KB, Downloaded 447 times)
 |  
	|  |  |