OpenVZ Forum: Support » OpenVZ IO Isolation ?

Home » General » Support » OpenVZ IO Isolation ? (OpenVZ IO Isolation Details)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? [message #42602 is a reply to message #42591]

Thu, 05 May 2011 17:07

swindmill
Messages: 57
Registered: April 2007

Member

Are you using ioprio for your containers?

Also, have you considered ionice'ing the mysql process that's causing your grief? This really isn't different from mysql on a standard linux host causing disk I/O contention and killing performance for other processes.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: andre on Thu, 28 April 2011 14:22
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: seanfulton on Sun, 01 May 2011 18:10
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: seanfulton on Tue, 03 May 2011 20:40
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: swindmill on Thu, 05 May 2011 17:07
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: seanfulton on Thu, 05 May 2011 18:28
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: swindmill on Thu, 05 May 2011 18:37
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: seanfulton on Thu, 05 May 2011 18:46
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: andre on Tue, 30 August 2011 00:58
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: seanfulton on Tue, 30 August 2011 15:26
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: andre on Wed, 31 August 2011 20:27
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: mustardman on Fri, 02 September 2011 17:04
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: seanfulton on Fri, 02 September 2011 18:06
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: seanfulton on Fri, 02 September 2011 18:11
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: mustardman on Fri, 02 September 2011 20:37
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: andre on Tue, 06 September 2011 02:32
		Re: OpenVZ IO Isolation ? By: raver119 on Tue, 13 September 2011 00:10

Previous Topic:	/dev/shm missing from fedora-15-x86 template
Next Topic:	NFS on Ubuntu 11.04

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Feb 20 09:43:23 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40096 seconds