OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Users » Xen hypervisor vs OpenVZ
Re: Xen hypervisor vs OpenVZ [message #42353 is a reply to message #42350] Tue, 05 April 2011 16:40 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
ckkashyap is currently offline  ckkashyap
Messages: 9
Registered: March 2011
Location: India
Junior Member
>
> I don't know, but I would consider the real competition to be between
> OpenVZ and libvirt/KVM - I don't think Xen is going anywhere in the long
> term.
>
> KVM supports the use of kernel-same-page-merging (KSM), which OpenVZ
> doesn't (yet?). For some applications KSM can be a big win...
>
> We currently use/support both OpenVZ and kvm.
>
> Tim.
>
>
> Thanks Tim ... from a pure performance standpoint, I'd imagine that any
kind of emulation/virtualization would have an overhead which is more than
openvz . So, if the usecase does not involve running different kernels, then
openvz style partitioning of system resources would yield more performance.
I am looking for more evidence supporting that :)

Regards,
Kashyap

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: ips
Next Topic: How do I know which IP packet is for which container in kernel space
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Jul 14 16:11:33 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11587 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers