Any news on a new kernel branch? [message #37694] |
Sat, 10 October 2009 21:16 |
gkovacs
Messages: 3 Registered: October 2009 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Junior Member |
|
|
As the current stable Linux kernel is rapidly approaching the 2.6.32 version, including a lot of exciting drivers and technologies (like the ext4 filesystem), I wonder what are the plans of the OpenVZ developers for a new development kernel branch?
- What kernel version is planned?
- In what timeframe can we expect it?
Also, when is the stable branch going to be stepped up from the 3 year old 2.6.18? I tried searching for a roadmap in the OpenVZ Wiki, but it's not available.
Is OpenVZ under active development?
[Updated on: Sat, 10 October 2009 21:20] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Any news on a new kernel branch? [message #37939 is a reply to message #37937] |
Wed, 04 November 2009 18:29 |
drescherjm
Messages: 27 Registered: February 2008
|
Junior Member |
|
|
BTW, I do not believe openvz is dead. I think the developers are focusing their effort on the RHEL kernels and commercial kernels. When red hat uses a 2.26.3X kernel in there next RHEL product I expect to see a openvz kernel for that.
Edit: Hmm 2.26 sounds more like gnome although they would never have a 30th patch release. I meant RHEL 6 having a 2.6.3X kernel
[Updated on: Thu, 05 November 2009 14:05] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Any news on a new kernel branch? [message #38024 is a reply to message #38023] |
Mon, 09 November 2009 13:33 |
sh1ny
Messages: 2 Registered: November 2009
|
Junior Member |
|
|
drescherjm wrote on Mon, 09 November 2009 08:28 | I did not mean KVM required a special kernel just that guests need a full kernel install to run so it is more heavy than a container approach. Also disk and overall performance is in no way as good as a container approach. If you do not believe me try compiling kde, a kernel or some other large library in any of these then do the same in a container. I have found that this takes 2 to 5 times longer in xen, vmware, virtualbox,kvm on good modern hardware with the hardware virtulization acceleration enabled versus the real hardware and only a few percent longer in a container.
|
Ofcourse, there's no objection to that. I found myself preferring KVM to Openvz for other, pure egoistic reasons - i don't run into upgrade issues with customers for one. Every time someone does a "do-release-upgrade" in ubuntu in an openvz container, i have to fix it after him, after hearing thousands of complaints about it
|
|
|
|