OpenVZ Forum: Discussions » Xen vs. OpenVZ: live migration

Home » General » Discussions » Xen vs. OpenVZ: live migration

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Xen vs. OpenVZ: live migration [message #3628 is a reply to message #3627]

Wed, 07 June 2006 15:44

cdevidal
Messages: 24
Registered: June 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Junior Member

kir wrote on Wed, 07 June 2006 11:41

This is actually a TCP feature. Default (and recommended by an RFC) TCP timeout is about two minutes if I remember correctly. So if the application is using TCP, it will be fine. Surely we tested that with Apache, MySQL, Oracle and other apps.

ROCK ON!!

I didn't know that...

And I suppose UDP doesn't care if some packets are lost?

R U good enough?
TenThousandDollarOffer.com

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Xen vs. OpenVZ: live migration By: cdevidal on Wed, 07 June 2006 15:15
		Re: Xen vs. OpenVZ: live migration By: kir on Wed, 07 June 2006 15:27
		Re: Xen vs. OpenVZ: live migration By: cdevidal on Wed, 07 June 2006 15:38
		Re: Xen vs. OpenVZ: live migration By: kir on Wed, 07 June 2006 15:41
		Re: Xen vs. OpenVZ: live migration By: cdevidal on Wed, 07 June 2006 15:44
		Re: Xen vs. OpenVZ: live migration By: kir on Wed, 07 June 2006 15:56

Previous Topic:	bug in vzsplit ?
Next Topic:	I need an installer.. help!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Oct 06 07:00:28 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.10811 seconds