OpenVZ Forum: Support » VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture?

Home » General » Support » VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture? [message #35636 is a reply to message #35635]

Thu, 09 April 2009 17:27

maratrus
Messages: 1495
Registered: August 2007
Location: Moscow

Senior Member

Quote:

In my opinion, this is not scaling very well...

Why not? What bothers you most?
Behind each virtual interface, veth101.0 for example, there is a subnet which only consists of single interface, eth0 inside VE for instance, so bridge will learn all VES' MACs and prevent flooding. Anyway, could you please let us know about results.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture? By: divB on Wed, 08 April 2009 14:13
		Re: VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture? By: maratrus on Thu, 09 April 2009 17:05
		Re: VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture? By: divB on Thu, 09 April 2009 17:14
		Re: VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture? By: maratrus on Thu, 09 April 2009 17:27
		Re: VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture? By: divB on Thu, 09 April 2009 22:25
		Re: VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture? By: maratrus on Fri, 10 April 2009 06:10
		Re: VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture? By: divB on Fri, 10 April 2009 10:06
		Re: VServers in three different networks: veth, venet or mixture? By: maratrus on Fri, 10 April 2009 10:16

Previous Topic:	Debian — kernel error
Next Topic:	kernel/rhel5/028stab060.8 Kernel Compilation Error

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Feb 18 18:11:06 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40600 seconds