Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace [message #32171 is a reply to message #32168] |
Wed, 23 July 2008 16:09  |
Daniel Hokka Zakrisso
Messages: 22 Registered: January 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Are there any more granular patches than this very grand one available?
http://download.openvz.org/kernel/022stab044.1/patches/patch -022stab044-combined
Have you given any thought to merging some of the functionality from
your patch back into the mainline kernel?
-- Dave> Are there any more granular patches than this very grand one available?
1. a bit more granular patches are available in SRC RPM. But these are
drivers only :(
2. they are not publicly available since it is private company CVS.
I think we are to setup git repository in near future. This will make
our developement process much more transparent.
if you are interested in some specific patch or piece of code, we can
extract it for you, though I understand it is not very much convinient
way of doing things.
> http://download.openvz.org/kernel/022stab044.1/patches/patch -022stab044-combined
>
> Have you given any thought to merging some of the functionality from
> your patch back into the mainline kernel?
We always send mainstream fixes to Linus et al.
Other functionality will be definetely sent to mainstream step by step,
but we do not wait it to be an easy and quick task.
KirillAll,
Please, add devel@openvz.org to CC on any
LKML/Linus/Morton/... communication.
KirillPatch from Pavel (xemul@):
Missed newline spoils ouptut.
--- ./fs/dcache.c.nl 2005-11-29 19:23:41.000000000 +0300
+++ ./fs/dcache.c 2005-11-30 16:51:48.089948864 +0300
@@ -1779,7 +1779,7 @@ static void check_alert(struct vfsmount
sb = dentry->d_sb;
printk(KERN_ALERT "%s check alert! file:[%s] from %d/%s, dev%x\n"
- "Task %d/%d[%s] from VE%d, execenv %d",
+ "Task %d/%d[%s] from VE%d, execenv %d\n",
str, p, VE_OWNER_FSTYPE(sb->s_type)->veid,
sb->s_type->nam
|
|
|