OpenVZ Forum: Devel » [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace

Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace [message #32048 is a reply to message #32043]

Thu, 17 July 2008 18:46

ebiederm
Messages: 1354
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

sukadev@us.ibm.com writes:
>

> Like Pavel said, we had couple of attempts to fix the larger problem of
> signal semantics in containers but did not have a consensus on handling
> blocked/unhandled signals to container-init.

Oh.  I thought we were pretty close then I or somebody ran out of steam.

> It would still be good to fix this "kill -1" problem.
>
> Eric had a slightly optimized interface, 'pid_in_pid_ns()' in following
> patchset. Maybe we could use that ?
>
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2007-December/009174.html

Eric

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 14:55
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Pavel Emelianov on Thu, 17 July 2008 15:01
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 15:24
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Pavel Emelianov on Thu, 17 July 2008 15:54
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Oleg Nesterov on Thu, 17 July 2008 17:31
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 17:50
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 17:45
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:39
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:45
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Sukadev Bhattiprolu on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:13
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:44
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:46
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Oleg Nesterov on Wed, 23 July 2008 14:33
		Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Wed, 23 July 2008 16:09

Previous Topic:	Roadmap for features planed for containers where and Some future features ideas.
Next Topic:	[PATCH] [openvz] printk: Handle global log buffer reallocation

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Sep 06 12:18:25 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.09684 seconds