OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » v2.6.26-rc7/cgroups: circular locking dependency
v2.6.26-rc7/cgroups: circular locking dependency [message #31342] Sat, 21 June 2008 17:38 Go to next message
Vegard Nossum is currently offline  Vegard Nossum
Messages: 2
Registered: June 2008
Junior Member
Hi,

I decided to see what cgroups is all about, and followed the instructions
in Documentation/cgroups.txt :-) It happened when I did this:

    [root@damson /dev/cgroup/Vegard 0]
    # echo 1 > cpuset.cpus

I can also provide the kernel config if necessary.


Vegard

 
 =======================================================
 [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
 2.6.26-rc7 #25
 -------------------------------------------------------
 bash/10032 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
 
 but task is already holding lock:
  (cgroup_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
 
 which lock already depends on the new lock.
 
 
 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
 
 -> #1 (cgroup_mutex){--..}:
        [<c015a435>] __lock_acquire+0xf45/0x1040
        [<c015a5c8>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
        [<c05416d1>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb1/0x300
        [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
        [<c0164750>] cpuset_handle_cpuhp+0x20/0x180
        [<c014ea77>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x70
        [<c014eae9>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x20
        [<c051f8c8>] _cpu_down+0x78/0x240
        [<c051fabb>] cpu_down+0x2b/0x40
        [<c0520cd9>] store_online+0x39/0x80
        [<c02f627b>] sysdev_store+0x2b/0x40
        [<c01d3372>] sysfs_write_file+0xa2/0x100
        [<c0195486>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130
        [<c0195b4d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
        [<c010831b>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xd1
        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
 
 -> #0 (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}:
        [<c0159fe5>] __lock_acquire+0xaf5/0x1040
        [<c015a5c8>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
        [<c05416d1>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb1/0x300
        [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
        [<c0163e6d>] rebuild_sched_domains+0x7d/0x3a0
        [<c01653a4>] cpuset_common_file_write+0x204/0x440
        [<c0162bc7>] cgroup_file_write+0x67/0x130
        [<c0195486>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130
        [<c0195b4d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
        [<c010831b>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xd1
        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
 
 other info that might help us debug this:
 
 1 lock held by bash/10032:
  #0:  (cgroup_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
 
 stack backtrace:
 Pid: 10032, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.26-rc7 #25
  [<c0157ae7>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x77/0x90
  [<c0159fe5>] __lock_acquire+0xaf5/0x1040
  [<c015a5c8>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
  [<c015efbc>] ? get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
  [<c05416d1>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb1/0x300
  [<c015efbc>] ? get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
  [<c015efbc>] ? get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
  [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
  [<c0163e6d>] rebuild_sched_domains+0x7d/0x3a0
  [<c0158e65>] ? mark_held_locks+0x65/0x80
  [<c0190ac5>] ? kfree+0xb5/0x120
  [<c027736a>] ? heap_free+0xa/0x10
  [<c027736a>] ? heap_free+0xa/0x10
  [<c01653a4>] cpuset_common_file_write+0x204/0x440
  [<c0163c30>] ? started_after+0x0/0x70
  [<c010e585>] ? native_sched_clock+0xb5/0x110
  [<c0162e10>] ? started_after+0x0/0x70
  [<c0164c80>] ? cpuset_test_cpumask+0x0/0x20
  [<c0164ca0>] ? cpuset_change_cpumask+0x0/0x20
  [<c0162bc7>] cgroup_file_write+0x67/0x130
  [<c01651a0>] ? cpuset_common_file_write+0x0/0x440
  [<c010e585>] ? native_sched_clock+0xb5/0x110
  [<c0195486>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130
  [<c0162b60>] ? cgroup_file_write+0x0/0x130
  [<c0195b4d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
  [<c010831b>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xd1
  =======================

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Re: v2.6.26-rc7/cgroups: circular locking dependency [message #31343 is a reply to message #31342] Sun, 22 June 2008 09:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Vegard Nossum is currently offline  Vegard Nossum
Messages: 2
Registered: June 2008
Junior Member
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Vegard Nossum - Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0200]
> |  =======================================================
> |  [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> |  2.6.26-rc7 #25
> |  -------------------------------------------------------
> |  bash/10032 is trying to acquire lock:
> |   (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
> |
> |  but task is already holding lock:
> |   (cgroup_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20

...

> Hi Vegard,
>
> would be interesting to see your config please

Here is my config and vmlinux:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/vegard/kernels/20080621-v2.6.26-rc7/

By the way, I was doing CPU hotplug/unplug at the time.

Thanks :)


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Re: v2.6.26-rc7/cgroups: circular locking dependency [message #31344 is a reply to message #31342] Sun, 22 June 2008 09:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Cyrill Gorcunov is currently offline  Cyrill Gorcunov
Messages: 3
Registered: June 2008
Junior Member
[Vegard Nossum - Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0200]
| Hi,
| 
| I decided to see what cgroups is all about, and followed the instructions
| in Documentation/cgroups.txt :-) It happened when I did this:
| 
|     [root@damson /dev/cgroup/Vegard 0]
|     # echo 1 > cpuset.cpus
| 
| I can also provide the kernel config if necessary.
| 
| 
| Vegard
| 
|  
|  =======================================================
|  [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
|  2.6.26-rc7 #25
|  -------------------------------------------------------
|  bash/10032 is trying to acquire lock:
|   (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
|  
|  but task is already holding lock:
|   (cgroup_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
|  
|  which lock already depends on the new lock.
|  
|  
|  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
|  
|  -> #1 (cgroup_mutex){--..}:
|         [<c015a435>] __lock_acquire+0xf45/0x1040
|         [<c015a5c8>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
|         [<c05416d1>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb1/0x300
|         [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
|         [<c0164750>] cpuset_handle_cpuhp+0x20/0x180
|         [<c014ea77>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x70
|         [<c014eae9>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x20
|         [<c051f8c8>] _cpu_down+0x78/0x240
|         [<c051fabb>] cpu_down+0x2b/0x40
|         [<c0520cd9>] store_online+0x39/0x80
|         [<c02f627b>] sysdev_store+0x2b/0x40
|         [<c01d3372>] sysfs_write_file+0xa2/0x100
|         [<c0195486>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130
|         [<c0195b4d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
|         [<c010831b>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xd1
|         [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
|  
|  -> #0 (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}:
|         [<c0159fe5>] __lock_acquire+0xaf5/0x1040
|         [<c015a5c8>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
|         [<c05416d1>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb1/0x300
|         [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
|         [<c0163e6d>] rebuild_sched_domains+0x7d/0x3a0
|         [<c01653a4>] cpuset_common_file_write+0x204/0x440
|         [<c0162bc7>] cgroup_file_write+0x67/0x130
|         [<c0195486>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130
|         [<c0195b4d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
|         [<c010831b>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xd1
|         [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
|  
|  other info that might help us debug this:
|  
|  1 lock held by bash/10032:
|   #0:  (cgroup_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
|  
|  stack backtrace:
|  Pid: 10032, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.26-rc7 #25
|   [<c0157ae7>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x77/0x90
|   [<c0159fe5>] __lock_acquire+0xaf5/0x1040
|   [<c015a5c8>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
|   [<c015efbc>] ? get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
|   [<c05416d1>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb1/0x300
|   [<c015efbc>] ? get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
|   [<c015efbc>] ? get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
|   [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
|   [<c0163e6d>] rebuild_sched_domains+0x7d/0x3a0
|   [<c0158e65>] ? mark_held_locks+0x65/0x80
|   [<c0190ac5>] ? kfree+0xb5/0x120
|   [<c027736a>] ? heap_free+0xa/0x10
|   [<c027736a>] ? heap_free+0xa/0x10
|   [<c01653a4>] cpuset_common_file_write+0x204/0x440
|   [<c0163c30>] ? started_after+0x0/0x70
|   [<c010e585>] ? native_sched_clock+0xb5/0x110
|   [<c0162e10>] ? started_after+0x0/0x70
|   [<c0164c80>] ? cpuset_test_cpumask+0x0/0x20
|   [<c0164ca0>] ? cpuset_change_cpumask+0x0/0x20
|   [<c0162bc7>] cgroup_file_write+0x67/0x130
|   [<c01651a0>] ? cpuset_common_file_write+0x0/0x440
|   [<c010e585>] ? native_sched_clock+0xb5/0x110
|   [<c0195486>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130
|   [<c0162b60>] ? cgroup_file_write+0x0/0x130
|   [<c0195b4d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
|   [<c010831b>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xd1
|   =======================
| 

Hi Vegard,

would be interesting to see your config please

		- Cyrill -
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Re: v2.6.26-rc7/cgroups: circular locking dependency [message #31345 is a reply to message #31343] Sun, 22 June 2008 09:50 Go to previous message
Cyrill Gorcunov is currently offline  Cyrill Gorcunov
Messages: 3
Registered: June 2008
Junior Member
[Vegard Nossum - Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:42:50AM +0200]
| On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
| > [Vegard Nossum - Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0200]
| > |  =======================================================
| > |  [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
| > |  2.6.26-rc7 #25
| > |  -------------------------------------------------------
| > |  bash/10032 is trying to acquire lock:
| > |   (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
| > |
| > |  but task is already holding lock:
| > |   (cgroup_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
| 
| ...
| 
| > Hi Vegard,
| >
| > would be interesting to see your config please
| 
| Here is my config and vmlinux:
| 
| http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/vegard/kernels/20080621-v2.6.26-rc7/
| 
| By the way, I was doing CPU hotplug/unplug at the time.
| 
| Thanks :)
| 
| 
| Vegard
| 
| -- 
| "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
| the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
| disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
| 	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
| 

Thanks Vegard,

actually i'm not that spec in this area ;) but will take a look

		- Cyrill -
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Previous Topic: [PATCH] introduce task cgroup v2
Next Topic: [PATCH 1/3] i/o bandwidth controller documentation
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Jul 17 02:33:16 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02871 seconds