Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, guys.  Sorry about the long silence.  Recent releases of
> popular distros overwhelmed me with ata bugs.  They now seem to be
> under control (and hopefully stay that way for some time to come).
> 
> On the previous iteration, I was hoping I could sort out sysfs
> interface problem before this patchset but given that this is a long
> overdue feature, I think we should get this thing working first.
> 
> The first four patches looked good to me, so feel free to add
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> 
> Benjamin Thery Wrote:
>> sysfs: sysfs_chmod_file handle multiple superblocks
>>
>> Teach sysfs_chmod_file how to handle multiple sysfs
>> superblocks.
> 
> I think it would be great if sysfs_chmod_file can do all-or-nothing
> instead of failing half way through but given the interface of
> notify_change(), it could be difficult to implement.  Any ideas?

Is it acceptable to queue the notifications in a list until we are in 
the loop and loop again to notify when exiting the first loop without 
error ?
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers