VE: ***: failed to start with err=-11 [message #28211] |
Tue, 11 March 2008 16:55 |
yoolee
Messages: 23 Registered: November 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi, All
I have 49 VE running, but I can't start the 50th one.
I am using 2.6.18-fza-028stab051.1-686-bigmem.
The dmesg gives:
VE: 150: failed to start with err=-11
The vzctl.log gives:
vzctl : VE 150 : Starting VE ...
vzctl : VE 150 : Mounting root: /vz/root/150 /vz/private/150
vzctl : VE 150 : Running: /etc/vz/conf/vps.mount
vzctl : VE 150 : VE is mounted
vzctl : VE 150 : Set iptables mask 0x000017bf
vzctl : VE 150 : Set features mask 0000000000000000/0000000000000000
vzctl : VE 150 : VE start failed
vzctl : VE 150 : Running: /usr/sbin/vzquota stat 150 -f
vzctl : VE 150 : VE is unmounted
And there are no fails in the /proc/user_beancounters.
Could anyone give some clues? Thanks a lot!
[Updated on: Tue, 11 March 2008 16:59] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: VE: ***: failed to start with err=-11 [message #28243 is a reply to message #28211] |
Wed, 12 March 2008 14:10 |
khorenko
Messages: 533 Registered: January 2006 Location: Moscow, Russia
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello,
take a look, may be you've exceeded some rlimit?
For example - number of users?
--
Konstantin
If your problem is solved - please, report it!
It's even more important than reporting the problem itself...
|
|
|
Re: VE: ***: failed to start with err=-11 [message #28245 is a reply to message #28243] |
Wed, 12 March 2008 14:31 |
yoolee
Messages: 23 Registered: November 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Thanks!
Could you please tell me how to examine "rlimit"? Is it in the /proc/user_beancounters? I can only find VE 101 - 149 in the file because the 150 can not start, and for the HW node resource comsumption, I list it below:
It seems all failcnt is zero.
uid resource held maxheld barrier limit failcnt
0: kmemsize 8428030 9395737 2147483647 2147483647 0
lockedpages 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
privvmpages 5090 10606 2147483647 2147483647 0
shmpages 1293 1309 2147483647 2147483647 0
dummy 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
numproc 264 277 2147483647 2147483647 0
physpages 2522 9004 2147483647 2147483647 0
vmguarpages 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
oomguarpages 2522 9004 2147483647 2147483647 0
numtcpsock 3 3 2147483647 2147483647 0
numflock 1 2 2147483647 2147483647 0
numpty 2 2 2147483647 2147483647 0
numsiginfo 0 2 2147483647 2147483647 0
tcpsndbuf 38560 38560 2147483647 2147483647 0
tcprcvbuf 49152 32768 2147483647 2147483647 0
othersockbuf 13392 19072 2147483647 2147483647 0
dgramrcvbuf 0 9400 2147483647 2147483647 0
numothersock 29 34 2147483647 2147483647 0
dcachesize 2727520 3943688 2147483647 2147483647 0
numfile 4393 4604 2147483647 2147483647 0
dummy 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
dummy 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
dummy 0 0 2147483647 2147483647 0
numiptent 10 10 2147483647 2147483647 0
[Updated on: Wed, 12 March 2008 14:35] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: VE: ***: failed to start with err=-11 [message #28247 is a reply to message #28245] |
Wed, 12 March 2008 14:45 |
khorenko
Messages: 533 Registered: January 2006 Location: Moscow, Russia
|
Senior Member |
|
|
no-no-no,
i meant standard Linux limits - you can examine them with 'ulimit -a'.
If your problem is solved - please, report it!
It's even more important than reporting the problem itself...
|
|
|
Re: VE: ***: failed to start with err=-11 [message #28248 is a reply to message #28247] |
Wed, 12 March 2008 15:10 |
yoolee
Messages: 23 Registered: November 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Yes, the output of ulimit -a is:
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
max nice (-e) 0
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) unlimited
max locked memory (kbytes, -l) unlimited
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files (-n) 1024
pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8
POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) unlimited
max rt priority (-r) 0
stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192
cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes (-u) unlimited
virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
file locks (-x) unlimited
I tried to stop 15 VEs, but it seems that the output of it does not change.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|