checkpoint vs iptables-save, [message #27911] |
Sun, 02 March 2008 18:33 |
Dariush Pietrzak
Messages: 40 Registered: November 2007
|
Member |
|
|
Hi,
recently I noticed this:
CPT ERR: failed to exec iptables-save: -2
CPT ERR: f76cb000,1089 :iptables-save exited with 255
this is fixable by such workaround: ln -s /bin/true /sbin/iptables-save
but it probably would be nicer to skip this check if iptables-save script
does not exist(or turn this into warning).
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
Total Existance Failure
|
|
|
|
Re: checkpoint vs iptables-save, [message #27933 is a reply to message #27916] |
Mon, 03 March 2008 13:56 |
Dariush Pietrzak
Messages: 40 Registered: November 2007
|
Member |
|
|
> If you are not going to use iptables rules inside VE, then you can set
> IPTABLES="" in VE config.
ok, this is good, thanks
> BTW, more easier workaround is to install iptables-save/restore utils inside
> this VE.
it's only easier in the sense that it's easier to install full set of dvds
of SuSE software just to be able to run web server, instead of installing
only what you need.
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
Total Existance Failure
|
|
|