OpenVZ Forum: Support » [solved] nfs mount vs. mount --bind

Home » General » Support » [solved] nfs mount vs. mount --bind

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

[solved] nfs mount vs. mount --bind [message #26347]

Mon, 21 January 2008 23:25

yahbluez
Messages: 18
Registered: August 2007
Location: Germany

Junior Member

Gents,

my question is.

What is better mounting an NFS share into each VE

or

mounting it on the host and bind it into the root after starting the VE?

Better means here where will the servers scale to more IO performance. I don't know where the buffering happens always on the host or in the VE when mountig inside the VE?

I think mounting inside VE has more sex but when the mount --bind gives more performnce or saves RAM i will prefer that.

Any idea?

with best regards
yahbluez

[Updated on: Fri, 25 January 2008 11:09]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[solved] nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: yahbluez on Mon, 21 January 2008 23:25
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: vaverin on Wed, 23 January 2008 05:55
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: freedev on Sun, 28 June 2009 00:08
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: maratrus on Mon, 29 June 2009 10:12
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: freedev on Mon, 29 June 2009 10:59
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: maratrus on Mon, 29 June 2009 14:57
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: freedev on Mon, 29 June 2009 16:52
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: maratrus on Tue, 30 June 2009 04:51

Previous Topic:	Additional partition in container?
Next Topic:	memory controller and OpenVZ

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Jul 10 17:32:04 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02801 seconds