OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Namespaces exhausted CLONE_XXX bits problem
Re: Namespaces exhausted CLONE_XXX bits problem [message #26101 is a reply to message #26076] Tue, 15 January 2008 15:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
serue is currently offline  serue
Messages: 750
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@openvz.org):
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 11:25 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >> Hmm. I have an idea how to make this w/o a new system call. This might
> >> look wierd, but. Why not stopple the last bit with a CLONE_NEWCLONE and
> >> consider the parent_tidptr/child_tidptr in this case as the pointer to 
> >> an array of extra arguments/flargs?
> > 
> > I guess that does keep us from having to add an _actual_ system call.
> 
> Exactly!

I'll be honest, while it's a really neat idea, in terms of code actually
going into tree I far far prefer a real new syscall.

But it sounds like I'm the only one so I'll just mention it once and
then bite my tongue  :)

thanks,
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] [RESEND] Change default MSGMNI tunable to scale with lowmem
Next Topic: [patch 0/9] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall (v6)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jul 06 15:07:40 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02815 seconds