OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH][IPV6]: Mischecked tw match in __inet6_check_established.
[PATCH][IPV6]: Mischecked tw match in __inet6_check_established. [message #26074] Tue, 15 January 2008 09:22 Go to next message
Pavel Emelianov is currently offline  Pavel Emelianov
Messages: 1149
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
When looking for a conflicting connection the !sk->sk_bound_dev_if
check is performed only for live sockets, but not for timewait-ed.

This is not the case for ipv4, for __inet6_lookup_established in
both ipv4 and ipv6 and for other places that check for tw-s.

Was this missed accidentally? If so, then this patch fixes it and
besides makes use if the dif variable declared in the function.

Fits both, net-2.6 and net-2.6.25.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>

---

diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
index d0b3447..a66a7d8 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int __inet6_check_established(struct inet_timewait_death_row *death_row,
 		   sk2->sk_family	       == PF_INET6	 &&
 		   ipv6_addr_equal(&tw6->tw_v6_daddr, saddr)	 &&
 		   ipv6_addr_equal(&tw6->tw_v6_rcv_saddr, daddr) &&
-		   sk2->sk_bound_dev_if == sk->sk_bound_dev_if) {
+		   (!sk2->sk_bound_dev_if || sk2->sk_bound_dev_if == dif)) {
 			if (twsk_unique(sk, sk2, twp))
 				goto unique;
 			else
Re: [PATCH][IPV6]: Mischecked tw match in __inet6_check_established. [message #26084 is a reply to message #26074] Tue, 15 January 2008 11:33 Go to previous message
davem is currently offline  davem
Messages: 463
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:22:52 +0300

> When looking for a conflicting connection the !sk->sk_bound_dev_if
> check is performed only for live sockets, but not for timewait-ed.
> 
> This is not the case for ipv4, for __inet6_lookup_established in
> both ipv4 and ipv6 and for other places that check for tw-s.
> 
> Was this missed accidentally? If so, then this patch fixes it and
> besides makes use if the dif variable declared in the function.
> 
> Fits both, net-2.6 and net-2.6.25.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>

This fix definitely looks correct.

I just sent Linus a pull request for other 2.6.24 fixes,
so I'll toss this into my net-2.6 tree tomorrow after
he pulls that stuff in.

Thanks!
Previous Topic: [PATCH 0/8 2.6.25] a set of small code cleanups
Next Topic: [patch 7/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged fuse mounts
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 16 22:22:02 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03006 seconds