OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Users » venet0: hw csum failure.
venet0: hw csum failure. [message #23517] Mon, 19 November 2007 13:55 Go to next message
Dariush Pietrzak is currently offline  Dariush Pietrzak
Messages: 40
Registered: November 2007
Member
 
Hi,
 I get something like this:

venet0: hw csum failure.

Call Trace:
 <IRQ> [<ffffffff8024aba4>] __skb_checksum_complete+0x4a/0x62
 [<ffffffff88221ce0>] :ip_conntrack:tcp_error+0x18a/0x26b
 [<ffffffff8021980b>] tcp_rcv_established+0x114/0x9e6
 [<ffffffff88221060>] :ip_conntrack:ip_conntrack_in+0xae/0x4f9
 [<ffffffff80231f8f>] nf_iterate+0x41/0x7d
 [<ffffffff8039b93f>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x2ca
 [<ffffffff80254346>] nf_hook_slow+0x78/0xe8
 [<ffffffff8039b93f>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x2ca
 [<ffffffff80233395>] ip_rcv+0x286/0x58a
 [<ffffffff8021e879>] netif_receive_skb+0x370/0x41d
 [<ffffffff8022eb8a>] process_backlog+0x84/0x101
 [<ffffffff8020bdce>] net_rx_action+0xa4/0x1b1
 [<ffffffff8021029f>] __do_softirq+0x98/0x138
 [<ffffffff8025bf24>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
 [<ffffffff80265c3f>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
 [<ffffffff80265dd4>] do_IRQ+0x144/0x14d
 [<ffffffff80254a82>] mwait_idle+0x0/0x4a
 [<ffffffff8025b249>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
 <EOI> [<ffffffff80254ab8>] mwait_idle+0x36/0x4a
 [<ffffffff80246ad1>] cpu_idle+0x60/0x7f
 [<ffffffff8052d623>] start_secondary+0x445/0x454

 the machine seems to be running perfectly fine, though it is rather worrying

venet0: hw csum failure.

Call Trace:
 <IRQ> [<ffffffff8024aba4>] __skb_checksum_complete+0x4a/0x62
 [<ffffffff88221ce0>] :ip_conntrack:tcp_error+0x18a/0x26b
 [<ffffffff80279957>] __wake_up_common+0x3e/0x68
 [<ffffffff88221060>] :ip_conntrack:ip_conntrack_in+0xae/0x4f9
 [<ffffffff80231f8f>] nf_iterate+0x41/0x7d
 [<ffffffff8039b93f>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x2ca
 [<ffffffff80254346>] nf_hook_slow+0x78/0xe8
 [<ffffffff8039b93f>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x2ca
 [<ffffffff80233395>] ip_rcv+0x286/0x58a
 [<ffffffff8021e879>] netif_receive_skb+0x370/0x41d
 [<ffffffff8022eb8a>] process_backlog+0x84/0x101
 [<ffffffff8020bdce>] net_rx_action+0xa4/0x1b1
 [<ffffffff8021029f>] __do_softirq+0x98/0x138
 [<ffffffff8025bf24>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
 <EOI> [<ffffffff80265c3f>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
 [<ffffffff8022a054>] local_bh_enable+0x88/0x9a
 [<ffffffff8022e016>] dev_queue_xmit+0x23b/0x25c
 [<ffffffff8022feb8>] ip_output+0x278/0x2a9
 [<ffffffff80232415>] ip_queue_xmit+0x403/0x467
 [<ffffffff8022fea4>] ip_output+0x264/0x2a9
 [<ffffffff80299716>] ub_sock_tcp_chargesend+0x3d/0x157
 [<ffffffff802204a5>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x72b/0x763
 [<ffffffff80248714>] tso_fragment+0x1b1/0x20f
 [<ffffffff803a8d1a>] tcp_push_one+0xed/0x11b
 [<ffffffff80224d82>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8d2/0xb8b
 [<ffffffff8025248d>] sock_sendmsg+0xd4/0xec
 [<ffffffff8022ea2d>] sock_recvmsg+0xde/0xf6
 [<ffffffff802921f6>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
 [<ffffffff8020c3bb>] do_sync_read+0xc7/0x104
 [<ffffffff8037928a>] sys_sendto+0x11c/0x14f
 [<ffffffff802921f6>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
 [<ffffffff8025da37>] __sched_text_start+0x167/0xdf7
 [<ffffffff8025ad4e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83

-- 
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
 Total Existance Failure

Report message to a moderator

Re: venet0: hw csum failure. [message #23522 is a reply to message #23517] Mon, 19 November 2007 17:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Thorsten Schifferdeck[1] is currently offline  Thorsten Schifferdeck[1]
Messages: 4
Registered: January 2007
Junior Member
 
Hi Darius,

what OpenVZ kernel is used a pre- or self-built and which version ?

Thorsten

Am Mo, 19.11.2007, 13:55, schrieb Dariush Pietrzak:
> Hi,
>  I get something like this:
>
> venet0: hw csum failure.
>
> Call Trace:
>  <IRQ> [<ffffffff8024aba4>] __skb_checksum_complete+0x4a/0x62
>  [<ffffffff88221ce0>] :ip_conntrack:tcp_error+0x18a/0x26b
>  [<ffffffff8021980b>] tcp_rcv_established+0x114/0x9e6
>  [<ffffffff88221060>] :ip_conntrack:ip_conntrack_in+0xae/0x4f9
>  [<ffffffff80231f8f>] nf_iterate+0x41/0x7d
>  [<ffffffff8039b93f>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x2ca
>  [<ffffffff80254346>] nf_hook_slow+0x78/0xe8
>  [<ffffffff8039b93f>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x2ca
>  [<ffffffff80233395>] ip_rcv+0x286/0x58a
>  [<ffffffff8021e879>] netif_receive_skb+0x370/0x41d
>  [<ffffffff8022eb8a>] process_backlog+0x84/0x101
>  [<ffffffff8020bdce>] net_rx_action+0xa4/0x1b1
>  [<ffffffff8021029f>] __do_softirq+0x98/0x138
>  [<ffffffff8025bf24>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
>  [<ffffffff80265c3f>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
>  [<ffffffff80265dd4>] do_IRQ+0x144/0x14d
>  [<ffffffff80254a82>] mwait_idle+0x0/0x4a
>  [<ffffffff8025b249>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
>  <EOI> [<ffffffff80254ab8>] mwait_idle+0x36/0x4a
>  [<ffffffff80246ad1>] cpu_idle+0x60/0x7f
>  [<ffffffff8052d623>] start_secondary+0x445/0x454
>
>  the machine seems to be running perfectly fine, though it is rather
> worrying
>
> venet0: hw csum failure.
>
> Call Trace:
>  <IRQ> [<ffffffff8024aba4>] __skb_checksum_complete+0x4a/0x62
>  [<ffffffff88221ce0>] :ip_conntrack:tcp_error+0x18a/0x26b
>  [<ffffffff80279957>] __wake_up_common+0x3e/0x68
>  [<ffffffff88221060>] :ip_conntrack:ip_conntrack_in+0xae/0x4f9
>  [<ffffffff80231f8f>] nf_iterate+0x41/0x7d
>  [<ffffffff8039b93f>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x2ca
>  [<ffffffff80254346>] nf_hook_slow+0x78/0xe8
>  [<ffffffff8039b93f>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x2ca
>  [<ffffffff80233395>] ip_rcv+0x286/0x58a
>  [<ffffffff8021e879>] netif_receive_skb+0x370/0x41d
>  [<ffffffff8022eb8a>] process_backlog+0x84/0x101
>  [<ffffffff8020bdce>] net_rx_action+0xa4/0x1b1
>  [<ffffffff8021029f>] __do_softirq+0x98/0x138
>  [<ffffffff8025bf24>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
>  <EOI> [<ffffffff80265c3f>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
>  [<ffffffff8022a054>] local_bh_enable+0x88/0x9a
>  [<ffffffff8022e016>] dev_queue_xmit+0x23b/0x25c
>  [<ffffffff8022feb8>] ip_output+0x278/0x2a9
>  [<ffffffff80232415>] ip_queue_xmit+0x403/0x467
>  [<ffffffff8022fea4>] ip_output+0x264/0x2a9
>  [<ffffffff80299716>] ub_sock_tcp_chargesend+0x3d/0x157
>  [<ffffffff802204a5>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x72b/0x763
>  [<ffffffff80248714>] tso_fragment+0x1b1/0x20f
>  [<ffffffff803a8d1a>] tcp_push_one+0xed/0x11b
>  [<ffffffff80224d82>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8d2/0xb8b
>  [<ffffffff8025248d>] sock_sendmsg+0xd4/0xec
>  [<ffffffff8022ea2d>] sock_recvmsg+0xde/0xf6
>  [<ffffffff802921f6>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
>  [<ffffffff8020c3bb>] do_sync_read+0xc7/0x104
>  [<ffffffff8037928a>] sys_sendto+0x11c/0x14f
>  [<ffffffff802921f6>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
>  [<ffffffff8025da37>] __sched_text_start+0x167/0xdf7
>  [<ffffffff8025ad4e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83

Report message to a moderator

Re: venet0: hw csum failure. [message #23523 is a reply to message #23522] Mon, 19 November 2007 18:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dariush Pietrzak is currently offline  Dariush Pietrzak
Messages: 40
Registered: November 2007
Member
 
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
> Hi Darius,
> 
> what OpenVZ kernel is used a pre- or self-built and which version ?
 2.6.18+ovz028stab047.1-combined+debian fixes for 2.6.18
 
-- 
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
 Total Existance Failure

Report message to a moderator

Re: venet0: hw csum failure. [message #23548 is a reply to message #23523] Tue, 20 November 2007 08:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
gblond is currently offline  gblond
Messages: 64
Registered: May 2007
Member
 
On 19 November 2007 21:10:15 Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
> > Hi Darius,
> >
> > what OpenVZ kernel is used a pre- or self-built and which version ?
>
>  2.6.18+ovz028stab047.1-combined+debian fixes for 2.6.18

1. Can you send me these debian patches?

2. Original 2.6.18-ovz028stab047.1 kernel also has this issue?


-- 
Thank,
Vitaliy Gusev

Report message to a moderator

Re: venet0: hw csum failure. [message #23554 is a reply to message #23523] Tue, 20 November 2007 10:02 Go to previous message
gblond is currently offline  gblond
Messages: 64
Registered: May 2007
Member
 
On 19 November 2007 21:10:15 Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
> > Hi Darius,
> >
> > what OpenVZ kernel is used a pre- or self-built and which version ?
>
>  2.6.18+ovz028stab047.1-combined+debian fixes for 2.6.18

Was hw-checksumming enabled on venet interface? (output of "ethtool -k 
venet0")



-- 
Thank,
Vitaliy Gusev

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Resume on restart?
Next Topic: PATCH for small cron prob. in /etc/init.d/vz
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Dec 28 08:21:04 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.68277 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers