Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Guys how complete do you fee the pid namespace support is that
> has been merged into Linus's tree?
> 
> My impression until I started reading through code earlier today
> was that the support was just about done except for a couple of
> tricky details.

Yes It looks sane.

Here's what I have in mind :

* there are some patches from suka that make sure the pid namespace init 
  is not getting abusively killed by one of this children 
* the pid cleanup is not complete 
	. locks
	. kthread (i should work soon on improving kthread to support 
          signals)

IMO, the proc mount shouldn't be under the pid namespace. we will 
need that sooner or later.


C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers