Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> The patch attached should help. The idea is simple. The "init" should be
> called only once without NETNS. Period. No need for any lists.

This is the kind of idea I had but I didn't think it could be 
that simple. :) 
Thanks Denis.

> I'll resend it to Dave after the ACK.

Tested on x86_64 with CONFIG_NET_NS=n and y. 
It fixes the issue we observed.

Acked-by: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net>


> Regards,
> 	Den
> 
> Benjamin Thery wrote:
>> Hello Pavel,
>>
>> I've found a problem with one of your patch related to netns:
>>
>> * [NETNS] Move some code into __init section when CONFIG_NET_NS=n (v2)
>>    http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg43310.html
>>
>> This patch introduces the __net_init/__net_exit/__net_initdata
>> defines to save some memory when CONFIG_NET_NS is not set.
>>
>> Cedric Le Goater reported he had a *non-fatal* oops when booting
>> a 2.6.23-mm1-lxc1 kernel with CONFIG_NET_NS=n. (2.6.23-mm1-lxc1 
>> contains the NETNS49 patchset). The oops occured when modules 
>> related to iptables were loaded after the boot completes.
>>
>> The problem is the following:
>>
>> - Your patch adds the __net_initdata attribute to pernet_operations 
>>   structures.
>>
>> - pernet_operations are registered via register_pernet_subsys() and 
>>   linked in the pernet_list during boot.
>>
>> - At the end of boot, pernet_operations are freed (because of the
>>   __net_initdata attribute), and the pernet_list (or first_device list) 
>>   points to freed memory.
>>
>> - After boot, network modules which are netns-aware try to register
>>   themselves with register_pernet_subsys() and ...KABOOM... page
>>   fault when accessing pernet_list (or first_device list).
>>   (I reproduce Cedric's oops with the command: iptables --list)
>>
>> This is not a problem right now in 2.6.23-mm1 or net-2.6 because 
>> there are very few netns-aware network subsystems merged and they
>> are all initialized during boot. But it will be problematic when 
>> we will merge netns code for subsystems which can be built as 
>> modules (eg. iptables, ...). I'm not sure we can use 
>> __net_init_data for pernet_operations then. 
>> Maybe we can add some checks in register_pernet_operations
>> when CONFIG_NET_NS=n.
>>
>> I haven't found a fix yet.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Benjamin
>>
> 


-- 
B e n j a m i n   T h e r y  - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D

   http://www.bull.com
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers