| Re: Godaddy [message #21437 is a reply to message #21431] |
Tue, 09 October 2007 08:16   |
khorenko
Messages: 533
Registered: January 2006
Location: Moscow, Russia
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello.
| csharp wrote on Tue, 09 October 2007 08:01 |
...
I like to ask , if I choose a basic Dedicated Server , will it be ok to use openVZ?
|
Well, might be i don't see here some important point, but i can't guess why this might be not ok.
| Quote: |
I read OpenVZ doc, it seems ,it's
quite straight forward. But I am not sure about
partionning requirments.
|
We do not require any specific partitioning, at the same time it makes sense to create a dedicated partition for the /vz. This will slightly increase the performance as there would be different journals for system / partition and /vz partition, one more advantage - if due to some reason fs corrupts (power fault or just a driver bug, whatever) this most likely won't get the Hardware Node down and let you fix the issue remotely.
| Quote: |
Would you recommend Xen or OpenVZ? I am planning to have
2 Dedicated Servers, one with Xen and another with OpenVZ.
But I like to start with one after a few months then set up second one to able to have Virtual Windows server as well.
|
For a Linux server running different Linux based VEs OpenVZ will give you better density/performance (i don't take the VEs management simplicity into the account here - it's better to try both products and decide for yourself). But if you want to run Windows based VEs, unfortunately you have to use non-OS level virtualization (http://wiki.openvz.org/Introduction_to_virtualization).
If your problem is solved - please, report it!
It's even more important than reporting the problem itself...
|
|
|
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
