Balbir Singh wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Balbir Singh wrote:
>>> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>>>> Could we make the user interface similar to the one in the memory
>>>>> controller please! It would make it easier for users to configure
>>>>> and control both.
>>>> Do you mean by merging the similar code or by making them look like
>>>> the same? If the second, than can you point at least one difference
>>>> except for "usage" vs "usage_in_bytes" (and similar) naming?
>>>>
>>> I meant similar naming, it makes it is easier if the naming convention
>>> is the same.
>> Ok. It looks like the naming in the memcontrol.c has changed after I
>> copied it from there :)
>>
>> BTW, after Andrew accept these patches I think I will spend some time
>> thinking about how to consolidate the res_counter files.
>>
> 
> Yes, we need to do that. Paul Menage wanted to pull in resource counters

No, please, no :) Let's have them splitted apart. I think that the
resource counter abstraction can be used in other places than the
control groups...

> into cgroups. Also, I'd like to be able to share res_counters between
> container groups or at-least support a hierarchy. We could discuss this
> at that point and/or send out an RFC to get more comments.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Pavel
> 
>