Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I noticed that you have a netns49 in your tree. Shall we use it ?
> 
> I haven't pulled in your timewait socket work as it looked incomplete
> but I should have removed the unnecessary tests for &init_net that
> you noticed in your other patchset.

I think Denis and I we reached a complete patch posted a couple of hours 
ago. Finally I didn't put the exit method in the inet_timewait_sock.c 
file but I added it to the tcp.c file. There is a comment about that in 
the header of the patch.

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers