OpenVZ Forum: Support » OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization?

Home » General » Support » OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? [message #20754 is a reply to message #20602]

Wed, 26 September 2007 00:22

tiger74
Messages: 3
Registered: September 2007
Location: Voyager 2

Junior Member

Hello dowdle,
Thank you for the insight. Now I know why they call it VMware (Virtual Machine ware?). I see... So, OpenVZ is another level of virtualization that is the OS? Ok.. I see.. much lighter. This is great. Well, distro is not a problem. I love Centos and the Redhat family.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: tiger74 on Sat, 22 September 2007 05:08
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: ugob on Sat, 22 September 2007 14:01
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: JimL on Sun, 23 September 2007 20:30
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: tiger74 on Mon, 24 September 2007 00:50
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: JimL on Mon, 24 September 2007 12:33
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: JimL on Tue, 25 September 2007 10:36
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: dowdle on Tue, 25 September 2007 23:02
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: tiger74 on Wed, 26 September 2007 00:22
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: blaise on Tue, 20 July 2010 08:07
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: JimL on Tue, 20 July 2010 11:04
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: blaise on Tue, 20 July 2010 17:10
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: JimL on Wed, 21 July 2010 11:26
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: blaise on Thu, 22 July 2010 10:07
		Re: OpenVZ vs. Other Virtualization? By: efball on Tue, 20 July 2010 22:18

Previous Topic:	LiveCD boots to blank screen
Next Topic:	proxy_ndp

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Sep 03 02:57:01 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06605 seconds