OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC][PATCH 0/15] Pid namespaces
Re: [PATCH 1/15] Move exit_task_namespaces() [message #19457 is a reply to message #15320] Thu, 26 July 2007 16:59 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member

Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/26, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> 
>>Make task release its namespaces after it has reparented all his
>>children to child_reaper, but before it notifies its parent about
>>its death.
>>
>>The reason to release namespaces after reparenting is that when task
>>exits it may send a signal to its parent (SIGCHLD), but if the parent
>>has already exited its namespaces there will be no way to decide what
>>pid to dever to him - parent can be from different namespace.
>>
>>The reason to release namespace before notifying the parent it that
>>when task sends a SIGCHLD to parent it can call wait() on this taks
>>and release it. But releasing the mnt namespace implies dropping
>>of all the mounts in the mnt namespace and NFS expects the task to
>>have valid sighand pointer.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
>>
>>---
>>
>>exit.c |    5 ++++-
>>1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff -upr linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1.orig/kernel/exit.c 
>>linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-7/kernel/exit.c
>>--- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1.orig/kernel/exit.c	2007-07-26 
>>16:34:45.000000000 +0400
>>+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-7/kernel/exit.c	2007-07-26 
>>16:36:37.000000000 +0400
>>@@ -788,6 +804,10 @@ static void exit_notify(struct task_stru
>>	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&tsk->children));
>>	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&tsk->ptrace_children));
>>
>>+	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
>>+	exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
>>+	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> 
> 
> No.
> 
> We "cleared" our ->children/->ptrace_children lists. Now suppose that
> another thread dies, and its forget_original_parent() choose us as a
> new reaper before we re-take tasklist.
> 
> I'll try to read other patches tomorrow, but I can't avoid a stupid
> question: can we have a CONFIG_ for that? This series adds a lot of
> complications.

the was a request from many people including Andrew that CONFIG_XXX
is bad approach.

> OK, I guess the answer is "it is very difficult t achieve", but can't
> help myself :)

First versions of Pavel's patches had CONFIG_XXX for this.

Thanks,
Kirill
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly
Next Topic: [PATCH 0/14] sysfs cleanups
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Sep 06 12:51:21 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.12577 seconds