Hello,
Okay, some questions.
* What do you think about not allowing duplicate names across different
tags? ie. there's only one ethX anywhere but it's visible only in a
specific namespace (and maybe in the default global one). Or does
everyone need its own eth0. If this is acceptable, the problem becomes
_much_ simpler.
* I think we can do away with the magic tag and use a pointer to
vfsmount instead. So, a process which wants to be in certain namespace
can bind-mount /sysfs to its own /sysfs and make needed sysfs nodes
bound to the mount. Does this sound okay? Such process should probably
be in its own chrooted environment to function properly.
* I haven't really followed the containers thread. Do people generally
agree on including it in mainline when we have all the fancy
virtualization stuff?
Thanks.
--
tejun
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers