Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'd still like to hear back from Kirill & co whether this framework is
> flexible enough for their work (OpenVZ, etc.) too.
My IMHO is that so far the proposed group scheduler doesn't look ready/suitable.
We need to have a working SMP version before it will be clear
whether the whole approach is good and works correct on variety of load patterns.
Thanks,
Kirill
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers