On 5/28/07, Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
> In any case, there's no point having cpu affinity if it's going to be
> ignored.  Maybe you could have two levels of affinity: 1. if set by a
> root it must be obeyed; and 2. if set by an ordinary user it can be
> overridden if the best interests of the system dictate.  BUT I think
> that would be a bad idea.

Something like that already exists (at least for controlling the
bounding set of allowed cpus) via cpusets.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers