OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Remaining straight forward kthread API conversions...
Re: [PATCH] nfs lockd reclaimer: Convert to kthread API [message #18362 is a reply to message #18346] Thu, 19 April 2007 16:21 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Trond Myklebust is currently offline  Trond Myklebust
Messages: 24
Registered: July 2006
Junior Member
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 01:58 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> 
> Start the reclaimer thread using kthread_run instead
> of a combination of kernel_thread and daemonize.
> The small amount of signal handling code is also removed
> as it makes no sense and is a maintenance problem to handle
> signals in kernel threads.

Vetoed. Removing stuff just because it doesn't make sense to you is not
acceptable.

Signal handling in reclaimer threads is there in order to allow
administrators to deal with the case where the server never comes up
again.

Trond

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [patch i2o] i2o layer cleanup
Next Topic: [PATCH] Make common helpers for seq_files that work with list_head-s
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 19 23:45:00 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07397 seconds