Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com):
>> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:
>> So in summary my only real complaint with removing CONFIG_USER_NS is
>> that it appears to me that the code is incomplete and has not been
>> closely scrutinized.  As such making it available to end users without
> 
> Valid complaint.
> 
>> even a warning when that is the case appears irresponsible.
>> Especially as much of the code that is sitting in Andrews tree is
>> merged into the production kernel, when the window opens.
> 
> An experimental marker like Cedric introduced does seem a good idea.

Current -mm contains a fix from Andrew which forces user namespace 
to Y by default. I'll wait for the next -mm to rework the CONFIG_USER_NS
if the patchset survives andrew's indigestion :( 

Sorry about that.

C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers